Load sharing between the shell and centrum in the lumbar vertebral body

被引:171
作者
Silva, MJ
Keaveny, TM
Hayes, WC
机构
[1] BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MED CTR, ORTHOPED BIOMECH LAB, DEPT ORTHOPED SURG, BOSTON, MA USA
[2] HARVARD UNIV, SCH MED, BOSTON, MA USA
[3] UNIV CALIF BERKELEY, ORTHOPAED BIOMECH LAB, DEPT ENGN MECH, BERKELEY, CA USA
[4] UNIV CALIF SAN FRANCISCO, DEPT ORTHOPAED SURG, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94143 USA
关键词
biomechanics; finite element analysis; lumbar spine; trabecular centrum; vertebral body; vertebral shell;
D O I
10.1097/00007632-199701150-00004
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. A finite element parametric analysis to investigate the relative load carrying roles of the shell and centrum in the lumbar vertebral body. Objective. To address the issue of the structural role of the vertebral shell and clarify some of the contradictions raised by previous studies. Summary of Background Data. A number of experimental and finite element studies have attempted to quantify the relative structural roles of the shell and centrum, but these studies support no consensus on the relative contribution of the shell to vertebral body strength. Methods. The authors developed finite element models to predict the fraction of the total compressive force acting on the lumbar vertebral body that is carried by the shell. Parametric variations were investigated to determine how the fraction of shell force was affected by changes in shell thickness, shell and centrum modulus, centrum anisotropy, and loading conditions. Results. The fraction of compressive force carried by the shell increased from approximately 0 at the endplate to approximately 0.2 at the mid-transverse plane for a typical case. The shelf force was highly sensitive to the degree of anisotropy of the trabecular centrum but was relatively insensitive to changes in shell thickness and the ratio of shell-to-centrum elastic modulus. Conclusions. The conflicting conclusions of previous studies about the structural roles of the vertebral shell and centrum can be explained by differences in their methods. Our findings support the claims that the shell accounts for only approximately 10% of vertebral strength in vivo and that the trabecular centrum is the dominant structural component of the vertebral body.
引用
收藏
页码:140 / 150
页数:11
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   POSTURE AND THE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF THE LUMBAR SPINE [J].
ADAMS, MA ;
MCNALLY, DS ;
CHINN, H ;
DOLAN, P .
CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 1994, 9 (01) :5-14
[2]  
[Anonymous], OSTEOPOROSIS AETIOLO
[3]   ELASTIC-MODULUS OF TRABECULAR BONE MATERIAL [J].
ASHMAN, RB ;
RHO, JY .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 1988, 21 (03) :177-181
[4]  
BELL G. H., 1967, CALCIFIED TISSUE RES, V1, P75, DOI 10.1007/BF02008077
[5]   A MORPHOMETRIC STUDY OF HUMAN LUMBAR AND SELECTED THORACIC VERTEBRAE [J].
BERRY, JL ;
MORAN, JM ;
BERG, WS ;
STEFFEE, AD .
SPINE, 1987, 12 (04) :362-367
[6]   DEFORMATION OF THE VERTEBRAL ENDPLATE UNDER AXIAL LOADING OF THE SPINE [J].
BRINCKMANN, P ;
FROBIN, W ;
HIERHOLZER, E ;
HORST, M .
SPINE, 1983, 8 (08) :851-856
[7]  
BROWN T D, 1984, Journal of Orthopaedic Research, V2, P32, DOI 10.1002/jor.1100020106
[8]   STIFFENING EFFECTS OF CORTICAL BONE ON VERTEBRAL CANCELLOUS BONE IN-SITU [J].
BRYCE, R ;
ASPDEN, RM ;
WYTCH, R .
SPINE, 1995, 20 (09) :999-1003
[9]  
Burr DB, 1994, SPINAL DISORDERS AGI
[10]   THE ELASTIC-MODULI OF HUMAN SUBCHONDRAL, TRABECULAR, AND CORTICAL BONE TISSUE AND THE SIZE-DEPENDENCY OF CORTICAL BONE MODULUS [J].
CHOI, K ;
KUHN, JL ;
CIARELLI, MJ ;
GOLDSTEIN, SA .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 1990, 23 (11) :1103-1113