Artificial Neural Networks in Mammography Interpretation and Diagnostic Decision Making

被引:30
作者
Ayer, Turgay [1 ]
Chen, Qiushi [1 ]
Burnside, Elizabeth S. [2 ]
机构
[1] Georgia Inst Technol, H Milton Stewart Sch Ind & Syst Engn, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Madison, WI 53792 USA
关键词
COMPUTER-AIDED DIAGNOSIS; BREAST-CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CLUSTERED MICROCALCIFICATIONS; SCREENING MAMMOGRAPHY; LOGISTIC-REGRESSION; RADIOLOGISTS INTERPRETATIONS; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAMS; RISK; CLASSIFICATION; MODELS;
D O I
10.1155/2013/832509
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
090105 [作物生产系统与生态工程];
摘要
Screening mammography is the most effective means for early detection of breast cancer. Although general rules for discriminating malignant and benign lesions exist, radiologists are unable to perfectly detect and classify all lesions as malignant and benign, for many reasons which include, but are not limited to, overlap of features that distinguish malignancy, difficulty in estimating disease risk, and variability in recommended management. When predictive variables are numerous and interact, ad hoc decision making strategies based on experience and memory may lead to systematic errors and variability in practice. The integration of computer models to help radiologists increase the accuracy of mammography examinations in diagnostic decision making has gained increasing attention in the last two decades. In this study, we provide an overview of one of the most commonly used models, artificial neural networks (ANNs), in mammography interpretation and diagnostic decision making and discuss important features in mammography interpretation. We conclude by discussing several common limitations of existing research on ANN-based detection and diagnostic models and provide possible future research directions.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]
[Anonymous], 2011, Breast Cancer Facts Figures 2011-2012
[2]
[Anonymous], 2003, BREAST IM REP DAT SY
[3]
Breast Cancer Risk Estimation With Artificial Neural Networks Revisited Discrimination and Calibration [J].
Ayer, Turgay ;
Alagoz, Oguzhan ;
Chhatwal, Jagpreet ;
Shavlik, Jude W. ;
Kahn, Charles E., Jr. ;
Burnside, Elizabeth S. .
CANCER, 2010, 116 (14) :3310-3321
[4]
Informatics in Radiology Comparison of Logistic Regression and Artificial Neural Network Models in Breast Cancer Risk Estimation [J].
Ayer, Turgay ;
Chhatwal, Jagpreet ;
Alagoz, Oguzhan ;
Kahn, Charles E., Jr. ;
Woods, Ryan W. ;
Burnside, Elizabeth S. .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 2010, 30 (01) :13-U27
[5]
BREAST-CANCER - PREDICTION WITH ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORK-BASED ON BI-RADS STANDARDIZED LEXICON [J].
BAKER, JA ;
KORNGUTH, PJ ;
LO, JY ;
WILLIFORD, ME ;
FLOYD, CE .
RADIOLOGY, 1995, 196 (03) :817-822
[6]
Association of volume and volume-independent factors with accuracy in screening mammogram interpretation [J].
Beam, CA ;
Conant, EF ;
Sickles, EA .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2003, 95 (04) :282-290
[7]
Breastcancer.org, 2006, BIOPS
[8]
SCREENING MAMMOGRAPHY IN COMMUNITY PRACTICE - POSITIVE PREDICTIVE VALUE OF ABNORMAL FINDINGS AND YIELD OF FOLLOW-UP DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURES [J].
BROWN, ML ;
HOUN, F ;
SICKLES, EA ;
KESSLER, LG .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1995, 165 (06) :1373-1377
[9]
Census.gov, 2005, BAS COUNTS POP
[10]
Chan Evelyn C Y, 2005, J Am Coll Radiol, V2, P311, DOI 10.1016/j.jacr.2004.09.012