Informatics in Radiology Comparison of Logistic Regression and Artificial Neural Network Models in Breast Cancer Risk Estimation

被引:135
作者
Ayer, Turgay [1 ,2 ]
Chhatwal, Jagpreet [4 ]
Alagoz, Oguzhan [1 ]
Kahn, Charles E., Jr. [5 ]
Woods, Ryan W. [2 ]
Burnside, Elizabeth S. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Ind & Syst Engn, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Radiol, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[3] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Biostat & Med Informat, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[4] Merck Res Labs, N Wales, PA USA
[5] Med Coll Wisconsin, Dept Radiol, Milwaukee, WI 53226 USA
关键词
OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVES; PREDICTION;
D O I
10.1148/rg.301095057
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Computer models in medical diagnosis are being developed to help physicians differentiate between healthy patients and patients with disease. These models can aid in successful decision making by allowing calculation of disease likelihood on the basis of known patient characteristics and clinical test results. Two of the most frequently used computer models in clinical risk estimation are logistic regression and an artificial neural network. A study was conducted to review and compare these two models, elucidate the advantages and disadvantages of each, and provide criteria for model selection. The two models were used for estimation of breast cancer risk on the basis of mammographic descriptors and demographic risk factors. Although they demonstrated similar performance, the two models have unique characteristics-strengths as well as limitations-that must be considered and may prove complementary in contributing to improved clinical decision making. (c) RSNA, 2009 . radiographics.rsna.org
引用
收藏
页码:13 / U27
页数:11
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
*AM COLL RAD, 2004, BREAST IM REP DAT SY
[2]   Hemorrhagic Transformation of Ischemic Stroke: Prediction with CT Perfusion [J].
Aviv, Richard I. ;
d'Esterre, Christopher D. ;
Murphy, Blake D. ;
Hopyan, Julia J. ;
Buck, Brian ;
Mallia, Gabriella ;
Li, Vivian ;
Zhang, Liying ;
Symons, Sean P. ;
Lee, Ting-Yim .
RADIOLOGY, 2009, 250 (03) :867-877
[3]  
AYER T, ARTIFICIAL IN PRESS
[4]   Prospective breast cancer risk prediction model for women undergoing screening mammography [J].
Barlow, William E. ;
White, Emily ;
Ballard-Barbash, Rachel ;
Vacek, Pamela M. ;
Titus-Ernstoff, Linda ;
Carney, Patricia A. ;
Tice, Jeffrey A. ;
Buist, Diana S. M. ;
Geller, Berta M. ;
Rosenberg, Robert ;
Yankaskas, Bonnie C. ;
Kerlikowske, Karla .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2006, 98 (17) :1204-1214
[5]   Comparing the predictive value of neural network models to logistic regression models on the risk of death for small-cell lung cancer patients [J].
Bartfay, E ;
Mackillop, WJ ;
Pater, JL .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE, 2006, 15 (02) :115-124
[6]   APPLICATION OF ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS TO CLINICAL MEDICINE [J].
BAXT, WG .
LANCET, 1995, 346 (8983) :1135-1138
[7]   Determinants of relationship quality: An artificial neural network analysis [J].
Bejou, D ;
Wray, B ;
Ingram, TN .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 1996, 36 (02) :137-143
[8]   A Logistic Regression Model Based on the National Mammography Database Format to Aid Breast Cancer Diagnosis [J].
Chhatwal, Jagpreet ;
Alagoz, Oguzhan ;
Lindstrom, Mary J. ;
Kahn, Charles E., Jr. ;
Shaffer, Katherine A. ;
Burnside, Elizabeth S. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2009, 192 (04) :1117-1127
[9]   SURVIVAL ANALYSIS OF CENSORED-DATA - NEURAL-NETWORK ANALYSIS DETECTION OF COMPLEX INTERACTIONS BETWEEN VARIABLES [J].
DELAURENTIIS, M ;
RAVDIN, PM .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 1994, 32 (01) :113-118
[10]   COMPARING THE AREAS UNDER 2 OR MORE CORRELATED RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVES - A NONPARAMETRIC APPROACH [J].
DELONG, ER ;
DELONG, DM ;
CLARKEPEARSON, DI .
BIOMETRICS, 1988, 44 (03) :837-845