Stroke warning syndrome: 18 new cases

被引:61
作者
Tassi, Rossana [1 ]
Cerase, Alfonso [2 ]
Acampa, Maurizio [1 ]
D'Andrea, Paolo [1 ]
Guideri, Francesca [1 ]
Lo Giudice, Giuseppe [1 ]
Marotta, Giovanna [1 ]
Bracco, Sandra [2 ]
Martini, Giuseppe [1 ]
机构
[1] Policlin Santa Maria Alle Scotte, Azienda Osped Univ Senese, Dept Neurol & Sensorineural Sci, Stroke Unit, I-53100 Siena, Italy
[2] Policlin Santa Maria Alle Scotte, Azienda Osped Univ Senese, Dept Neurol & Sensorineural Sci, Unit NINT Neuroimaging & Neurointervent, I-53100 Siena, Italy
关键词
Capsular warning syndrome; Intravenous thrombolysis; Pontine warning syndrome; Stroke warning syndrome; Small vessel diseases; Transient ischemic attack; ACUTE ISCHEMIC-STROKE; THROMBOLYSIS; CLOPIDOGREL; ASPIRIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.jns.2013.05.027
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
100204 [神经病学];
摘要
Background: Stroke warning syndrome (SWS) is a rare cause of stroke characterized by recurrent and short-lasting episodes of transient focal neurological deficits leading up to infarction. On the basis of clinical findings and neuroimaging, it can be capsular, pontine, or callosal. The aim of this study is to evaluate the prevalence of SWS in patients admitted to our Stroke Unit for an ischemic stroke and to look for the difference in outcome between patients treated or not with systemic thrombolysis by intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (IV-rtPA). Methods: Among the 967 patients admitted to our Stroke Unit between April 2008 and January 2013 for ischemic stroke, we identified 18 patients with SWS. Nine patients underwent IV-rtPA (IV Group) and the other 9 (No IV Group) other therapies. Results: The prevalence of SWS in our population was 1.8%. The most common risk factors were hypertension and dyslipidemia in both groups. A good outcome at 3-month follow-up (modified Rankin Scale 0-2) was found in 3 patients (33%) in IV Group and in 5 patients (55%) in No IV Group. Conclusion: SWS is an under-recognized syndrome. Intravenous rt-PA treatment seems to have lower efficacy than in other subtypes of strokes, but none of the patients with SWS undergoing treatment presented haemorrhagic transformation or other complications. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:168 / 171
页数:4
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]
Combined Antithrombotic Treatment With Aspirin and Clopidogrel for Patients With Capsular Warning Syndrome A Case Report [J].
Asil, Talip ;
Ir, Nasif ;
Karaduman, Fatih ;
Cagli, Bekir ;
Tuncel, Sedat .
NEUROLOGIST, 2012, 18 (02) :68-69
[2]
Good outcomes in ischemic stroke patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis despite regressing neurological symptoms [J].
Baumann, CR ;
Baumgartner, RW ;
Gandjour, J ;
von Büdingen, HC ;
Siegel, AM ;
Georgiadis, D .
STROKE, 2006, 37 (05) :1332-1333
[3]
[4]
Does thrombolysis benefit patients with lacunar syndrome? [J].
Cocho, D ;
Belvis, R ;
Martí-Fabregasa, J ;
Bravo, Y ;
Aleu, A ;
Pagonabarraga, J ;
Molina-Porcel, L ;
Díaz-Manera, J ;
San Roman, L ;
Martínez-Lage, M ;
Martínez, A ;
Moreno, M ;
Martí-Vilalta, JL .
EUROPEAN NEUROLOGY, 2006, 55 (02) :70-73
[5]
HEPARIN FOR LACUNAR STROKE IN PROGRESSION [J].
DOBKIN, BH .
STROKE, 1983, 14 (03) :421-423
[6]
THE CAPSULAR WARNING SYNDROME - PATHOGENESIS AND CLINICAL-FEATURES [J].
DONNAN, GA ;
OMALLEY, HM ;
QUANG, L ;
HURLEY, S ;
BLADIN, PF .
NEUROLOGY, 1993, 43 (05) :957-962
[7]
Oral clopidogrel load in aspirin-resistant Capsular warning syndrome [J].
Fahey, CD ;
Alberts, MJ ;
Bernstein, RA .
NEUROCRITICAL CARE, 2005, 2 (02) :183-184
[8]
CAPSULAR WARNING SYNDROME PRECEDING PONTINE INFARCTION [J].
FARRAR, J ;
DONNAN, GA .
STROKE, 1993, 24 (05) :762-762
[9]
Thrombolysis in capsular warning syndrome [J].
Gonzalez Hernandez, Ayoze ;
Fabre Pi, Oscar ;
Lopez Fernandez, Juan Carlos ;
Diaz Nicolas, Santiago .
MEDICINA CLINICA, 2010, 134 (13) :612-613
[10]
Hastak SM, 2012, INT J STROKE