The Relative Efficacy of Meperidine for the Treatment of Acute Migraine: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

被引:25
作者
Friedman, Benjamin W. [1 ]
Kapoor, Alok [2 ]
Friedman, Matt S. [3 ]
Hochberg, Michael L.
Rowe, Brian H. [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Albert Einstein Coll Med, Montefiore Med Ctr, Dept Emergency Med, Bronx, NY 10467 USA
[2] Boston Univ, Hosp Med Unit, Gen Internal Med Sect, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[3] Mt Sinai Med Ctr, Dept Emergency Med, New York, NY 10029 USA
[4] Univ Alberta, Dept Emergency Med, Sch Publ Hlth, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[5] Univ Alberta, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, Sch Publ Hlth, Edmonton, AB, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.05.036
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Study objective: Despite guidelines recommending against opioids as first-line treatment for acute migraine, meperidine is the agent used most commonly in North American emergency departments. Clinical trials performed to date have been small and have not arrived at consistent conclusions about the efficacy of meperidine. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the relative efficacy and adverse effect profile of opioids compared with nonopioid active comparators for the treatment of acute migraine. Methods: We searched multiple sources (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and LILACS, emergency and headache medicine conference proceedings) for randomized controlled trials comparing parenteral opioid and nonopioid active comparators for the treatment of acute migraine headache. Our primary outcome was relief of headache. If this was unavailable, we accepted rescue medication use or we transformed visual analog scale change scores by using an established procedure. We grouped studies by comparator: a regimen containing dihydroergotamine, antiemetic alone, or ketorolac. For each study, we calculated an odds ratio (OR) of headache relief and then assessed clinical and statistical heterogeneity for the group of studies. We then pooled the ORs of headache relief with a random-effects model. Results: From 899 citations, 19 clinical trials were identified, of which 11 were appropriate and had available data. Four trials involving, 254 patients compared meperidine to dihydroergotamine, 4 trials involving 248 patients compared meperidine to an antiemetic, and 3 trials involving 123 patients compared meperidine to ketorolac. Meperidine was less effective than dihydroergotamine at providing headache relief (OR=0.30; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.09 to 0.97) and trended toward less efficacy than the antiemetics (OR=0.46; 95% CI 0.19 to 1.11); however, the efficacy of meperidine was similar to that of ketorolac (OR=1.75; 95% CI 0.84 to 3.61). Compared to dihydroergotamine, meperidine caused more sedation (OR=3.52; 95% CI 0.87 to 14.19) and dizziness (OR=8.67; 95% CI 2.66 to 28.23). Compared to the antiemetics, meperidine caused less akathisia (OR=0.10; 95% CI 0.02 to 0.57). Meperidine and ketorolac use resulted in similar rates of gastrointestinal adverse effects (OR=1.27; 95% CI 0.31 to 5.15) and sedation (OR=1.70; 95% CI 0.23 to 12.72). Conclusion: Clinicians should consider alternatives to meperidine when treating acute migraine with injectable agents. [Ann Emerg Med. 2008;52:705-713.]
引用
收藏
页码:705 / 713
页数:9
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   COMPARISON OF SINGLE-DOSE MEPERIDINE, BUTORPHANOL, AND DIHYDROERGOTAMINE IN THE TREATMENT OF VASCULAR HEADACHE [J].
BELGRADE, MJ ;
LING, LJ ;
SCHLEEVOGT, MB ;
ETTINGER, MG ;
RUIZ, E .
NEUROLOGY, 1989, 39 (04) :590-592
[2]   Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial of two intravenous morphine dosages (0.10 mg/kg and 0.15 mg/kg) in emergency department patients with moderate to severe acute pain [J].
Birnbaum, Adrienne ;
Esses, David ;
Bijur, Polly E. ;
Holden, Lynne ;
Gallagher, E. John .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2007, 49 (04) :445-453
[3]   Double-blind, multicenter trial to compare the efficacy of intramuscular dihydroergotamine plus hydroxyzine versus intramuscular meperidine plus hydroxyzine for the emergency department treatment of acute migraine headache [J].
Carleton, SC ;
Shesser, RF ;
Pietrzak, MP ;
Chudnofsky, CR ;
Starkman, S ;
Morris, DL ;
Johnson, G ;
Rhee, KJ ;
Barton, CW ;
Chelly, JE ;
Rosenberg, J ;
Van Valen, MK .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1998, 32 (02) :129-138
[4]  
Chang AK, 2006, ANN EMERG MED, V48, P164, DOI 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.03.005
[5]   Prospective, randomised, double blind, controlled comparison of metoclopramide and pethidine in the emergency treatment of acute primary vascular and tension type headache episodes [J].
Cicek, M ;
Karcioglu, O ;
Parlak, I ;
Ozturk, V ;
Duman, O ;
Serinken, M ;
Guryay, M .
EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2004, 21 (03) :323-326
[6]   Parenteral dihydroergotamine for acute migraine headache: A systematic review of the literature [J].
Colman, I ;
Brown, MD ;
Innes, GD ;
Grafstein, E ;
Roberts, TE ;
Rowe, BH .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2005, 45 (04) :393-401
[7]   Use of narcotic analgesics in the emergency department treatment of migraine headache [J].
Colman, I ;
Rothney, A ;
Wright, SC ;
Zilkalns, B ;
Rowe, BH .
NEUROLOGY, 2004, 62 (10) :1695-1700
[8]   Parenteral metoclopramide for acute migraine: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials [J].
Colman, I ;
Brown, MD ;
Innes, GD ;
Grafstein, E ;
Roberts, TE ;
Rowe, BH .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 329 (7479) :1369-1372
[9]   KETOROLAC VERSUS MEPERIDINE-PLUS-PROMETHAZINE TREATMENT OF MIGRAINE HEADACHE - EVALUATIONS BY PATIENTS [J].
DAVIS, CP ;
TORRE, PR ;
WILLIAMS, C ;
GRAY, C ;
BARRETT, K ;
KRUCKE, G ;
PEAKE, D ;
BASS, B .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1995, 13 (02) :146-150
[10]   KETOROLAC VERSUS MEPERIDINE AND HYDROXYZINE IN THE TREATMENT OF ACUTE MIGRAINE HEADACHE - A RANDOMIZED, PROSPECTIVE, DOUBLE-BLIND TRIAL [J].
DUARTE, C ;
DUNAWAY, F ;
TURNER, L ;
ALDAG, J ;
FREDERICK, R .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1992, 21 (09) :1116-1121