Nerve sparing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Our technique

被引:88
作者
Curto, F [1 ]
Benijts, J [1 ]
Pansadoro, A [1 ]
Barmoshe, S [1 ]
Hoepffner, JL [1 ]
Mugnier, C [1 ]
Piechaud, T [1 ]
Gaston, R [1 ]
机构
[1] Clin St Augustin, Dept Urol, Bordeaux, France
关键词
laparoscopy; prostatectomy; nerve-sparing; intrafascial;
D O I
10.1016/j.eururo.2005.11.029
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: To describe our technique of nerve sparing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP). We present the oncological and functional results (potency and urinary continence). Material and methods: LRP has become standard at our institution based on experience with more than 2800 consecutive cases operated on between 1997 and 2005. From May 2003 to March 2005 a total of 677 LRP were performed, 425 consecutive patients candidates for a nerve sparing technique have been operated using the intrafascial approach. The challenge of our technique is to remove the prostate without any thermic and mechanic traumatism, avoiding dissection of outer layer. Oncological data were assessed by pathological examination and postoperative PSA level. Functional results were assessed with a self questionnaire. Results: By pathological stage, 2 pT2a specimens (7.4%), 7 pT2b specimens (21%), 44 pT2c specimens (24%), 63 pT3a specimens (43%), 11 pT3b specimens (46%) were found to have positive surgical margins (SMs). In 86 specimen (59%) positive SMs were focal inframillimetric. Median follow-up was 11 months (range 1-22). The continence rate (no leak age/no pad) was 95% at 6 months, confirmed at 12 months among 202 patients. For 137 patients, potency rate was 58.5% at 12 months. Conclusion: Intrafascial LRP provides satisfactory results in regard to recovery of continence and sexual function. Long-term progression and survival outcome are necessary before this procedure should be offered as a replacement for interfascial nerve sparing technique. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:344 / 352
页数:9
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   Radical retropubic versus laparoscopic prostatectomy: A prospective comparison of functional outcome [J].
Anastasiadis, AG ;
Salomon, L ;
Katz, R ;
Hoznek, A ;
Chopin, D ;
Abbou, CC .
UROLOGY, 2003, 62 (02) :292-297
[2]   Extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy - Results after 50 cases [J].
Bollens, R ;
Vanden Bossche, M ;
Roumeguere, T ;
Damoun, A ;
Ekane, S ;
Hoffmann, P ;
Zlotta, AR ;
Schulman, CC .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2001, 40 (01) :65-69
[3]  
Dubernard P, 2003, PROG UROL, V13, P163
[4]  
Fischetti G, 2001, Minerva Urol Nefrol, V53, P185
[5]   Intraoperative frozen section analysis during nerve sparing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Feasibility study [J].
Fromont, G ;
Baumert, H ;
Cathelineau, X ;
Rozet, F ;
Validire, P ;
Vallancien, G .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 170 (05) :1843-1846
[6]   Impact of margin size on the incidence of local residual tumor after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy [J].
Fromont, G ;
Cathelineau, X ;
Rozet, F ;
Prapotnich, D ;
Validire, P ;
Vallancien, G .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 172 (05) :1845-1847
[7]   Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Preliminary pathologic evaluation [J].
Fromont, G ;
Guillonneau, B ;
Validire, P ;
Vallancien, G .
UROLOGY, 2002, 60 (04) :661-665
[8]   Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Technique [J].
Gill, IS ;
Zippe, CD .
UROLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2001, 28 (02) :423-+
[9]  
Grise P, 2001, Cancer Control, V8, P532
[10]   Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: assessment after 550 procedures [J].
Guillonneau, B ;
Cathelineau, X ;
Doublet, JD ;
Baumert, H ;
Vallancien, G .
CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ONCOLOGY HEMATOLOGY, 2002, 43 (02) :123-133