Deploying the chronic care model to implement and sustain diabetes self-management training programs

被引:57
作者
Siminerio, LM
Piatt, GA
Emerson, S
Ruppert, K
Saul, M
Solano, F
Stewart, A
Zgibor, JC
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Med Ctr, Diabet Inst, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Grad Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Med, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1177/0145721706287156
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose The purpose of this project was to evaluate the utility of using the 6 elements of the chronic care model (CCM; health system, community, decision support, self-management support, clinical information systems, and delivery system design) to implement and financially Sustain an effective diabetes self-management training (DSMT) program. Methods The University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) uses all elements of the CCM. Partnerships were formed between UPMC and western Pennsylvanian community hospitals and practices; the American Diabetes Association DSMT recognition program provided decision support. A clinical data repository and reorganization of primary care practices aided in Supporting DSMT. The following process and patient outcomes were measured: number of recognized programs, reimbursement, patient hemoglobin A1C levels, and the proportion of patients who received DSMT in primary care practices versus hospital-based programs. Results Using elements of the CCM, the researchers were able to gain administrative support; expand the number of recognized programs from 3 to 21; cover costs through increased reimbursement; reduce hemoglobin A1C levels (P <.0001), and increase the proportion of patients receiving DSMT through delivery in primary care (26.4% suburban; 19.8% urban) versus hospital-based practices (8.3%; P <.0001). Conclusions The CCM serves as an effective model for implementing and sustaining DSMT programs.
引用
收藏
页码:253 / 260
页数:8
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] *AM DIAB ASS, HIST NAT STAND ED RE
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2004, Clinical Diabetes, DOI DOI 10.2337/DIACLIN.22.2.54]
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2001, Cochrane Database Syst Rev
  • [4] Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness - The chronic care model, part 2
    Bodenheimer, T
    Wagner, EH
    Grumbach, K
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2002, 288 (15): : 1909 - 1914
  • [5] FREQUENCY AND DETERMINANTS OF DIABETES PATIENT EDUCATION AMONG ADULTS IN THE US POPULATION
    COONROD, BA
    BETSCHART, J
    HARRIS, MI
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 1994, 17 (08) : 852 - 858
  • [6] Department of Health and Human Services (USA), 2000, HLTH PEOPL 2010 UND
  • [7] Glasgow R. E., 2005, PSYCHOL DIABETES CAR, P141
  • [8] EVALUATING DIABETES EDUCATION - ARE WE MEASURING THE MOST IMPORTANT OUTCOMES
    GLASGOW, RE
    OSTEEN, VL
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 1992, 15 (10) : 1423 - 1432
  • [9] Long term effects and costs of brief behavioural dietary intervention for patients with diabetes delivered from the medical office
    Glasgow, RE
    LaChance, PA
    Toobert, DJ
    Brown, J
    Hampson, SE
    Riddle, MC
    [J]. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 1997, 32 (03) : 175 - 184
  • [10] COMMUNITY DIABETES CARE - A 10-YEAR PERSPECTIVE
    HISS, RG
    ANDERSON, RM
    HESS, GE
    STEPIEN, CJ
    DAVIS, WK
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 1994, 17 (10) : 1124 - 1134