Increasing web survey response rates in innovation research: An experimental study of static and dynamic contact design features

被引:200
作者
Sauermann, Henry [1 ]
Roach, Michael [2 ]
机构
[1] Georgia Inst Technol, Coll Management, Atlanta, GA 30308 USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Kenan Flagler Business Sch, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Web surveys; Response rates; Experiment; Incentives; Personalization; Survey timing; Response bias; INCENTIVES; MAIL; NONRESPONSE; DECISION; IMPACT; PARTICIPATE; PERFORMANCE; PSYCHOLOGY; BEHAVIOR; PAY;
D O I
10.1016/j.respol.2012.05.003
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Web surveys have become increasingly central to innovation research but often suffer from low response rates. Based on a cost-benefits framework and the explicit consideration of heterogeneity across respondents, we consider the effects of key contact design features such as personalization, incentives, and the exact timing of survey contacts on web survey response rates. We also consider the benefits of a "dynamic strategy", i.e., the approach to change features of survey contacts over the survey life cycle. We explore these effects experimentally using a career survey sent to over 24,000 junior scientists and engineers. The results show that personalization increases the odds of responding by as much as 48%, while lottery incentives with a high payoff and a low chance of winning increase the odds of responding by 30%. Furthermore, changing the wording of reminders over the survey life cycle increases the odds of a response by over 30%, while changes in contact timing (day of the week or hour of the day) did not have significant benefits. Improvements in response rates did not come at the expense of lower data quality. Our results provide novel insights into web survey response behavior and suggest useful tools for innovation researchers seeking to increase survey participation. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:273 / 286
页数:14
相关论文
共 57 条
[51]   A comparison of response rate, response time, and costs of mail and electronic surveys [J].
Shannon, DM ;
Bradshaw, CC .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL EDUCATION, 2002, 70 (02) :179-192
[52]   A primer on Internet organizational surveys [J].
Simsek, Z ;
Veiga, JF .
ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS, 2001, 4 (03) :218-235
[53]   Entrepreneurial effectiveness of European universities: An empirical assessment of antecedents and trade-offs [J].
Van Looy, Bart ;
Landoni, Paolo ;
Callaert, Julie ;
van Pottelsberghe, Bruno ;
Sapsalis, Eleftherios ;
Debackere, Koenraad .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2011, 40 (04) :553-564
[54]  
Wagner J. R., 2008, PhD thesis
[55]   SELF-SELECTED AND RANDOMLY SELECTED RESPONDENTS IN A COMPUTER NETWORK SURVEY [J].
WALSH, JP ;
KIESLER, S ;
SPROULL, LS ;
HESSE, BW .
PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 1992, 56 (02) :241-244
[56]   OPTIMAL TIMES TO CONTACT SAMPLE HOUSEHOLDS [J].
WEEKS, MF ;
JONES, BL ;
FOLSOM, RE ;
BENRUD, CH .
PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 1980, 44 (01) :101-114
[57]   UNDERSTANDING MAIL SURVEY RESPONSE BEHAVIOR - A METAANALYSIS [J].
YAMMARINO, FJ ;
SKINNER, SJ ;
CHILDERS, TL .
PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 1991, 55 (04) :613-639