Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy -: the experience of the German Laparoscopic Working Group

被引:120
作者
Rassweiler, J
Stolzenburg, J
Sulser, T
Deger, S
Zumbé, J
Hofmockel, G
John, H
Janetschek, G
Fehr, JL
Hatzinger, M
Probst, M
Rothenberger, KH
Poulakis, V
Truss, M
Popken, G
Westphal, J
Alles, U
Fornara, P
机构
[1] Heidelberg Univ, Dept Urol, SLK Kliniken Heilbronn, D-77074 Heilbronn, Germany
[2] Univ Leipzig, Dept Urol, D-7010 Leipzig, Germany
[3] Univ Basel, Dept Urol, Basel, Switzerland
[4] Univ Berlin, Dept Urol, Berlin, Germany
[5] Klinikum Leverkusen, Dept Urol, Leverkusen, Germany
[6] Klinikum Worms, Dept Urol, Worms, Germany
[7] Univ Zurich, Dept Urol, CH-8006 Zurich, Switzerland
[8] Elisabethenkrankenhaus Linz, Dept Urol, Linz, Austria
[9] Univ Mannheim, Dept Urol, Mannheim, Germany
[10] Goethe Univ Frankfurt, Dept Urol, D-6000 Frankfurt, Germany
[11] Nord West Krankenhaus Frankfurt, Dept Urol, Frankfurt, Germany
[12] Leibniz Univ Hannover, Dept Urol, D-30167 Hannover, Germany
[13] Helios Kliniken, Dept Urol, Berlin, Germany
[14] St Josephshosp, Dept Urol, Krefeld, Germany
[15] Klinikum Kaiserslautern, Dept Urol, Kaiserslautern, Germany
[16] Univ Halle Wittenberg, Dept Urol, D-4010 Halle An Der Saale, Germany
关键词
prostate cancer; laparoscopy prostatectomy;
D O I
10.1016/j.eururo.2005.10.003
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: To present the current status of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) in Germany, Austria and Switzerland with respect to transferability, learning curve, and outcome. Material and methods: The data of 5824 patients who underwent LRP in 18 centers by 50 urologists from March 1999 to August 2004 were analyzed retrospectively. Three centers performed more than 500, and six more than 250 cases. A transperitoneal descending technique with was used in 2701, a transperitoneal ascending in 1234, an extraperitoneal descending in 1814, and an extraperitoneal ascending modification in 75 cases. Specimen showed pT2 in 3535, pT3a in 1555, pT3b in 623, and pT4 in Ill cases. Results: Mean operating time averaged 211 (131-292) minutes, with shorter duration of the extraperitoneal descending technique. Conversion to open surgery averaged 2.4 (0-14.1) %. Re-intervention rate amounted to 2.7 (0.3-7.7) %. Complication rate averaged 8.9 (1.8-10.8) % including bleeding (0.3-2.5%) and rectal lesion (1.5-2.5%). The rate of positive margins was 10.6 (3.2-18) % for pT2- and 32.7 (20-38.5) % for pT3a-tumors Continence after 12 months was 84.9 (72-94) %. Data about potency (7 centers) revealed 52.5 (35-67) % full erections following bilateral nerve preservation. 5 year-PSA recurrence rate (3 centers) was 8.6 (4-15.3) % for pT2-tumors and 17.5 (15-20.6) % for pT3a-stages. Conclusions: The results confirm the efficacy of the training program with safe transfer of LRP (i.e. low complication rate), however including all known problems of a retrospective study. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:113 / 119
页数:7
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] AHLERING TE, 2003, J UROLOGY, V172, P776
  • [2] Intraoperative and perioperative morbidity of contemporary radical retropubic prostatectomy in a consecutive series of 1243 patients: Results of a single center between 1999 and 2002
    Augustin, H
    Hammerer, P
    Graefen, M
    Palisaar, R
    Noldus, J
    Fernandez, S
    Huland, H
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2003, 43 (02) : 113 - 118
  • [3] Extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy - Results after 50 cases
    Bollens, R
    Vanden Bossche, M
    Roumeguere, T
    Damoun, A
    Ekane, S
    Hoffmann, P
    Zlotta, AR
    Schulman, CC
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2001, 40 (01) : 65 - 69
  • [4] De La Rosette Jean J M C H, 2002, Arch Esp Urol, V55, P603
  • [5] Positive margins after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: A prospective study of 100 cases performed by 4 different surgeons
    El-Feel, A
    Davis, JW
    Deger, S
    Roigas, J
    Wille, AH
    Schnorr, D
    Hakiem, AA
    Loening, S
    Tuerk, IA
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2003, 43 (06) : 622 - 626
  • [6] Comparison of training modalities for performing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Experience with 1,000 patients
    Frede, T
    Erdogru, T
    Zukosky, D
    Gulkesen, H
    Teber, D
    Rassweiler, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2005, 174 (02) : 673 - 678
  • [7] Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Technique
    Gill, IS
    Zippe, CD
    [J]. UROLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2001, 28 (02) : 423 - +
  • [8] GRAEFEN M, 2005, EAU UPDATE SERIES, V3, P77
  • [9] Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Technical and early oncological assessment of 40 operations
    Guillonneau, B
    Cathelineau, X
    Barret, E
    Rozet, F
    Vallancien, G
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 1999, 36 (01) : 14 - 20
  • [10] Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Oncological evaluation after 1,000 cases at Montsouris Institute
    Guillonneau, B
    El-Fettouh, H
    Baumert, H
    Cathelineau, X
    Doublet, JD
    Fromont, G
    Vallancien, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 169 (04) : 1261 - 1266