Choosing between Hospitals: The Influence of the Experiences of Other Patients

被引:39
作者
de Groot, I. B. [1 ]
Otten, W. [3 ]
Dijs-Elsinga, J. [1 ]
Smeets, H. J. [4 ]
Kievit, J. [1 ,2 ]
Marang-van de Mheen, P. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Med Decis Making, NL-2300 RC Leiden, Netherlands
[2] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Surg, NL-2300 RC Leiden, Netherlands
[3] TNO Qual life, BU Prevent & Care, Sect Hlth Promot, Leiden, Netherlands
[4] Bronovo Hosp, Dept Surg, The Hague, Netherlands
关键词
adaptive choice-based conjoint; CQ-Index; hierarchical Bayes; hospital choice; quality of care; patient experiences; decision making; QUALITY-OF-CARE; ADAPTIVE CONJOINT-ANALYSIS; HEALTH-CARE; CONSUMERS WANT; ACQUIRED INFECTIONS; PERFORMANCE DATA; PREFERENCES; CHOICE; INFORMATION; FEASIBILITY;
D O I
10.1177/0272989X12443416
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
100404 [儿少卫生与妇幼保健学];
摘要
Objective. Publicly available information on hospital performance is increasing, with the aim to support consumers when choosing a hospital. Besides general hospital information and information on outcomes of care, there is increasing availability of systematically collected information on experiences of other patients. The aim of this study was to assess the influence of previous patients' experiences relative to other information when choosing a hospital for surgical treatment. Methods. Three hundred thirty-seven patient volunteers and 280 healthy volunteers (response rate of 52.4% and 93.3%, respectively) filled out an Internet-based questionnaire that included an adaptive choice-based conjoint analysis. They were asked to select hospital characteristics they would use for future hospital choice, compare hospitals, and choose the overall best hospital. Based on the respondents' choices, the relative importance (RI) of each hospital characteristic for each respondent was estimated using hierarchical Bayes estimation. Results. Information based on previous patients' experience was considered at least as important as information provided by hospitals. "Report card regarding physician's expertise'' had the highest RI (16.83 [15.37-18.30]) followed by "waiting time for outpatient clinic appointment'' (14.88 [13.42-16.34]) and "waiting time for surgery'' (7.95 [7.12-8.78]). Patient and healthy volunteers considered the same hospital attributes to be important, except that patient volunteers assigned greater importance to "positive judgment about physician communication'' (7.65 v. 5.80, P < 0.05) and lower importance to "complications'' (2.56 v. 4.22, P < 0.05). Conclusion. Consumers consider patient experience-based information at least as important as hospital-based information. They rely most on information regarding physicians' expertise, waiting time, and physicians' communication when choosing a hospital.
引用
收藏
页码:764 / 778
页数:15
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]
Facilitating and understanding the family's choice of injection device for growth hormone therapy by using conjoint analysis [J].
Ahmed, S. F. ;
Smith, W. A. ;
Blamires, C. .
ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD, 2008, 93 (02) :110-114
[2]
Transition of care: experiences and preferences of patients across the primary/secondary interface - a qualitative study [J].
Berendsen, Annette J. ;
de Jong, G. Majella ;
Jong, Betty Meyboom-de ;
Dekker, Janny H. ;
Schuling, Jan .
BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2009, 9
[3]
Berwick DM, 2003, MED CARE, V41, pI30
[4]
Understanding patient preferences for HIV medications using adaptive conjoint analysis: Feasibility assessment [J].
Beusterien, KM ;
Dziekan, K ;
Flood, E ;
Harding, G ;
Jordan, JC .
VALUE IN HEALTH, 2005, 8 (04) :453-461
[5]
Development and evaluation of the CAHPS® Hospital Survey [J].
Darby, C ;
Hays, RD ;
Kletke, P .
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2005, 40 (06) :1973-1976
[6]
Choosing a Hospital for Surgery: The Importance of Information on Quality of Care [J].
Dijs-Elsinga, Joyce ;
Otten, Wilma ;
Versluijs, Martine M. ;
Smeets, Harm J. ;
Kievit, Job ;
Vree, Robbert ;
van der Made, Wendeline J. ;
Marang-van de Mheen, Perla J. .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2010, 30 (05) :544-555
[7]
What information do consumers want and need? [J].
EdgmanLevitan, S ;
Cleary, PD .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 1996, 15 (04) :42-56
[8]
What benefits will choice bring to patients? Literature review and assessment of implications [J].
Fotaki, Marianna ;
Roland, Martin ;
Boyd, Alan ;
McDonald, Ruth ;
Scheaff, Rod ;
Smith, Liz .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH & POLICY, 2008, 13 (03) :178-184
[9]
Understanding patient preferences for the treatment of lupus nephritis with Adaptive Conjoint Analysis [J].
Fraenkel, L ;
Bogardus, S ;
Wittink, DR .
MEDICAL CARE, 2001, 39 (11) :1203-1216
[10]
An international review of projects on hospital performance assessment [J].
Groene, Oliver ;
Skau, Jutta K. H. ;
Frolich, Anne .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2008, 20 (03) :162-171