Transition of care: experiences and preferences of patients across the primary/secondary interface - a qualitative study

被引:64
作者
Berendsen, Annette J. [1 ]
de Jong, G. Majella [1 ]
Jong, Betty Meyboom-de [1 ]
Dekker, Janny H. [1 ]
Schuling, Jan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Gen Practice, NL-9713 AV Groningen, Netherlands
关键词
HEALTH-CARE; GENERAL-PRACTICE; PATIENTS VIEWS; FOLLOW-UP; REFERRALS; CANCER;
D O I
10.1186/1472-6963-9-62
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
100404 [儿少卫生与妇幼保健学];
摘要
Background: Coordination between care providers of different disciplines is essential to improve the quality of care, in particular for patients with chronic diseases. The way in which general practitioners (GP's) and medical specialists interact has important implications for any healthcare system in which the GP plays the role of gatekeeper to specialist care. Patient experiences and preferences have proven to be increasingly important in discussing healthcare policy. The Dutch government initiated the development of a special website with information for patients on performance indicators of hospitals as well as information on illness or treatment. In the present study we focus on the transition of care at the primary - secondary interface with reference to the impact of patients' ability to make choices about their secondary care providers. The purpose of this study is to (a) explore experiences and preferences of patients regarding the transition between primary and secondary care, (b) study informational resources on illness/treatment desired by patients and (c) determine how information supplied could make it easier for the patient to choose between different options for care (hospital or specialist). Methods: We conducted a qualitative study using semi-structured focus group interviews among 71 patients referred for various indications in the north and west of The Netherlands. Results: Patients find it important that they do not have to wait, that they are taken seriously, and receive adequate and individually relevant information. A lack of continuity from secondary to primary care was experienced. The patient's desire for free choice of type of care did not arise in any of the focus groups. Conclusion: Hospital discharge information needs to be improved. The interval between discharge from specialist care and the report of the specialist to the GP might be a suitable performance indicator in healthcare. Patients want to receive information, tailored to their own situation. The need for information, however, is quite variable. Patients do not feel strongly about self-chosen healthcare, contrary to what administrators presently believe.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]
Rheumatology: the expectations and preferences of patients for their follow-up monitoring care: a qualitative study to determine the dimensions of patient satisfaction [J].
Arthur, V ;
Clifford, C .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2004, 13 (02) :234-242
[2]
Treating patients with colorectal cancer in rural and urban areas: a qualitative study of the patients' perspective [J].
Bain, NSC ;
Campbell, NC .
FAMILY PRACTICE, 2000, 17 (06) :475-479
[3]
Measuring patients' attitudes to care across the primary/secondary interface: the development of the patient career diary [J].
Baker, R ;
Preston, C ;
Cheater, F ;
Hearnshaw, H .
QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 1999, 8 (03) :154-160
[4]
What do patients really want? Patients' preferences for treatment for angina [J].
Bowling, Ann ;
Culliford, Lucy ;
Smith, David ;
Rowe, Gene ;
Reeves, Barnaby C. .
HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2008, 11 (02) :137-147
[5]
NATIONAL SURVEY OF HOSPITAL PATIENTS [J].
BRUSTER, S ;
JARMAN, B ;
BOSANQUET, N ;
WESTON, D ;
ERENS, R ;
DELBANCO, TL .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1994, 309 (6968) :1542-1546
[6]
Burkey Y, 1997, BRIT MED J, V315, P1138
[7]
Health care quality - Incorporating consumer perspectives [J].
Cleary, PD ;
EdgmanLevitan, S .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1997, 278 (19) :1608-1612
[8]
Freeman G., 2007, Continuity of care 2006: what have we learned since 2000 and where are the policy imperatives now? Report for the National Co-ordinating Centre for NHS Service Delivery and Organisation R D
[9]
What is important in evaluating health care quality? An international comparison of user views [J].
Groenewegen, PP ;
Kerssens, JJ ;
Sixma, HJ ;
van der Eijk, I ;
Boerma, WG .
BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2005, 5 (1)
[10]
Resolving the gatekeeper conundrum - What patients value in primary care and referrals to specialists [J].
Grumbach, K ;
Selby, JV ;
Damberg, C ;
Bindman, AB ;
Quesenberry, C ;
Truman, A ;
Uratsu, C .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1999, 282 (03) :261-266