Prophylaxis of cytomegalovirus infection in liver transplantation - A randomized trial comparing a combination of ganciclovir and acyclovir to acyclovir
被引:65
作者:
Badley, AD
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:MAYO CLIN & MAYO FDN,DIV INFECT DIS,ROCHESTER,MN 55905
Badley, AD
Seaberg, EC
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:MAYO CLIN & MAYO FDN,DIV INFECT DIS,ROCHESTER,MN 55905
Seaberg, EC
Porayko, MK
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:MAYO CLIN & MAYO FDN,DIV INFECT DIS,ROCHESTER,MN 55905
Porayko, MK
Wiesner, RH
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:MAYO CLIN & MAYO FDN,DIV INFECT DIS,ROCHESTER,MN 55905
Wiesner, RH
Keating, MR
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:MAYO CLIN & MAYO FDN,DIV INFECT DIS,ROCHESTER,MN 55905
Keating, MR
Wilhelm, MP
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:MAYO CLIN & MAYO FDN,DIV INFECT DIS,ROCHESTER,MN 55905
Wilhelm, MP
Walker, RC
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:MAYO CLIN & MAYO FDN,DIV INFECT DIS,ROCHESTER,MN 55905
Walker, RC
Patel, R
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:MAYO CLIN & MAYO FDN,DIV INFECT DIS,ROCHESTER,MN 55905
Patel, R
Marshall, WF
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:MAYO CLIN & MAYO FDN,DIV INFECT DIS,ROCHESTER,MN 55905
Marshall, WF
DeBernardi, M
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:MAYO CLIN & MAYO FDN,DIV INFECT DIS,ROCHESTER,MN 55905
DeBernardi, M
Zetterman, R
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:MAYO CLIN & MAYO FDN,DIV INFECT DIS,ROCHESTER,MN 55905
Zetterman, R
Steers, JL
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:MAYO CLIN & MAYO FDN,DIV INFECT DIS,ROCHESTER,MN 55905
Steers, JL
Paya, CV
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:MAYO CLIN & MAYO FDN,DIV INFECT DIS,ROCHESTER,MN 55905
Paya, CV
机构:
[1] MAYO CLIN & MAYO FDN,DIV INFECT DIS,ROCHESTER,MN 55905
[2] MAYO CLIN & MAYO FDN,LIVER TRANSPLANTAT UNIT,ROCHESTER,MN 55905
Background The optimal prophylactic regimen to prevent cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and disease in orthotopic liver-transplant patients remains to be established. We tested whether a combination of intravenous ganciclovir (GCV) followed by high dosages of oral acyclovir (ACV) for 4 months provided a higher degree of protection from CMV than oral ACV alone. Methods. One hundred sixty-seven liver-transplant recipients were randomized to receive 120 days of antiviral treatment starting at the time of transplantation consisting of either ACV 800 mg orally four times daily (n=84) or 14 days of GCV 5 mg/kg intravenously every 12 hr followed by oral ACV 800 mg four times daily (n=83). Prospective laboratory and clinical surveillance was performed to determine primary endpoints (onset of CMV infection and CMV disease) and secondary endpoints (rates of fungal and bacterial infection, allograft rejection, and survival after transplantation). One-year event rates are presented as cumulative percentages. Results. During the first year after transplantation, CMV infection developed in 57% of patients treated with ACV and in 37% of patients treated with GCV + ACV (P=0.001). CMV disease developed in 23% of patients treated with ACV and in 11% of patients treated with GCV + ACV (P=0.03). In seronegative recipients of allografts from CMV-seropositive donors (D+/R-), CMV disease developed in 58% of patients treated with ACV and in 25% of patients treated with GCV + ACV (P=0.04). In the D+/R- group, 54% of patients treated with ACV and 17% of patients treated with GCV + ACV developed infection with Candida albicans (P=0.05). Conclusions. Prophylaxis of CMV infection in liver-transplant patients with 14 days of intravenous GCV followed by high-dosage oral ACV is more effective than high-dosage oral AGV alone at reducing CMV infection and disease, even for patients in the D+/R- cMV serological group.