Top management retention in cross-border acquisitions: the roles of financial incentives, acquirer's commitment and autonomy

被引:45
作者
Ahammad, Mohammad Faisal [1 ,6 ]
Glaister, Keith W. [2 ]
Weber, Yaakov [3 ,5 ]
Tarba, Shlomo Yedidia [4 ]
机构
[1] Nottingham Trent Univ, Div Accounting & Finance, Nottingham Business Sch, Nottingham, England
[2] Univ Sheffield, Sch Management, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
[3] Coll Management, Sch Business Adm, Rishon Leziyyon, Israel
[4] Open Univ, Dept Econ & Management, Raanana, Israel
[5] Coll Management, Sch Business, Dept Strategy & Entrepreneurship, Rishon Leziyyon, Israel
[6] Nottingham Trent Univ, Div Finance, Nottingham, England
关键词
top management retention; cross-border acquisitions; relative standing theory; financial incentives; autonomy; commitment; UK; HR PRACTICES; PERFORMANCE; TURNOVER; DIVERSIFICATION; COMPENSATION; PRODUCTIVITY; DEPARTURES; POLICIES; SYSTEMS; MERGERS;
D O I
10.1504/EJIM.2012.048158
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Using data from a sample of Cross-Border Acquisitions (CBAs) made by UK firms, the present paper investigates the determinants of top management retention in CBAs. Applying both the theory of relative standing and the financial incentive mechanism of retention, we find that post-acquisition autonomy of the acquired firm and the acquirer's commitment to the acquired organisation significantly affect top management retention. By contrast, and contrary to conventional wisdom, when interacting with other variables financial incentives may have a negative effect on top management retention. The managerial implications of the findings and directions for future research are also discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:458 / 480
页数:23
相关论文
共 77 条
[11]   From the Editors: Common method variance in international business research [J].
Chang, Sea-Jin ;
van Witteloostuijn, Arjen ;
Eden, Lorraine .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS STUDIES, 2010, 41 (02) :178-184
[12]  
Child J., 2001, MANAGEMENT INT ACQUI
[13]   Employees intent to leave: A comparison of determinants of intent to leave versus intent to stay [J].
Cho, Seonghee ;
Johanson, Misty M. ;
Guchait, Priyanko .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HOSPITALITY MANAGEMENT, 2009, 28 (03) :374-381
[15]   What (not) to expect when surveying executives: A meta-analysis of top manager response rates and techniques over time [J].
Cycyota, CS ;
Harrison, DA .
ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS, 2006, 9 (02) :133-160
[16]   RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN TYPE OF ACQUISITION, THE AUTONOMY GIVEN TO THE ACQUIRED FIRM, AND ACQUISITION SUCCESS - AN EMPIRICAL-ANALYSIS [J].
DATTA, DK ;
GRANT, JH .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 1990, 16 (01) :29-44
[17]  
Davis R., 2003, MANAGE INT REV, V43, P172
[18]  
Diaz M., 1997, Journal of High Technology Management Research, V8, P301
[19]  
EISENBERGER R, 1986, J APPL PSYCHOL, V71, P500, DOI 10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.500
[20]   PERCEIVED ORGANIZATIONAL SUPPORT AND EMPLOYEE DILIGENCE, COMMITMENT, AND INNOVATION [J].
EISENBERGER, R ;
FASOLO, P ;
DAVISLAMASTRO, V .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1990, 75 (01) :51-59