The Lucas critique revisited - Assessing the stability of empirical Euler equations for investment

被引:20
作者
Oliner, SD
Rudebusch, GD
Sichel, D
机构
[1] FED RESERVE BANK SAN FRANCISCO, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105 USA
[2] BROOKINGS INST, WASHINGTON, DC 20036 USA
关键词
Lucas critique; Euler equation; business investment;
D O I
10.1016/0304-4076(94)01693-3
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Lucas (1976) argued that the parameters of traditional macroeconometric models depended crucially on agents' expectations and were unlikely to remain stable in a changing economic environment, In response, econometric modeling has focused on the estimation of rational expectations models that have an explicit structural interpretation - Euler equations in particular, Thus, a natural, though little acknowledged, criterion for judging the success of empirical Euler equations is the stability of their 'deep', structural parameters, Examining split-sample tests over multiple breakpoints as well as the sequence of subsample model estimates, we find considerable instability in the estimated parameters of a standard Euler equation of investment.
引用
收藏
页码:291 / 316
页数:26
相关论文
共 52 条
[11]  
CHIRINKO RS, 1988, AM ECON REV, V78, P206
[12]   TESTS OF EQUALITY BETWEEN SETS OF COEFFICIENTS IN 2 LINEAR REGRESSIONS [J].
CHOW, GC .
ECONOMETRICA, 1960, 28 (03) :591-605
[13]  
DEMERS F, 1993, 9310 CARL U EC PAP
[15]   GENERALIZED PREDICTIVE TESTS AND STRUCTURAL-CHANGE ANALYSIS IN ECONOMETRICS [J].
DUFOUR, JM ;
GHYSELS, E ;
HALL, A .
INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1994, 35 (01) :199-229
[16]  
DUFOUR JM, 1989, STATISTICAL ANAL FOR, P441
[17]   SUBSTITUTION, RISK-AVERSION, AND THE TEMPORAL BEHAVIOR OF CONSUMPTION AND ASSET RETURNS - AN EMPIRICAL-ANALYSIS [J].
EPSTEIN, LG ;
ZIN, SE .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1991, 99 (02) :263-286
[18]  
GARBER P, 1983, NBER31 TECHN WORK PA
[19]  
GERTLER M, 1991, NAT BUR EC, P11
[20]   A TEST FOR STRUCTURAL STABILITY OF EULER CONDITIONS PARAMETERS ESTIMATED VIA THE GENERALIZED-METHOD OF MOMENTS ESTIMATOR [J].
GHYSELS, E ;
HALL, A .
INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1990, 31 (02) :355-364