Proton beam dosimetry for radiosurgery: implementation of the ICRU Report 59 at the Harvard Cyclotron Laboratory

被引:22
作者
Newhauser, WD [1 ]
Myers, KD [1 ]
Rosenthal, SJ [1 ]
Smith, AR [1 ]
机构
[1] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, NE Proton Therapy Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Boston, MA 02114 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1088/0031-9155/47/8/310
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Recent proton dosimetry intercomparisons have demonstrated that the adoption of a common protocol, e.g. ICRU Report 59, can lead to improved consistency in absorbed dose determinations. We compared absorbed dose values, measured in the 160 MeV proton radiosurgery beamline at the Harvard Cyclotron Laboratory, based on ionization chamber methods with those from a Faraday cup technique. The Faraday cup method is based on a proton fluence determination that allows the estimation of absorbed dose with the CEMA approximation, under which the dose is equal to the fluence times the mean mass stopping power. The ionization chamber technique employs an air-kerma calibration coefficient for Co-60 radiation and a calculated correction in order to take into account the differences in response to Co-60 and proton beam radiations. The absorbed dose to water, based on a diode measurement calibrated with a Faraday cup technique, is approximately 2% higher than was obtained from an ionization chamber measurement. At the Bragg peak depth, the techniques agree to within their respective uncertainties, which are both approximately 4% (1 standard deviation). The ionization chamber technique exhibited superior reproducibility and was adopted in our standard clinical practice for radiosurgery.
引用
收藏
页码:1369 / 1389
页数:21
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]   THE CALIBRATION AND USE OF PLANE-PARALLEL IONIZATION CHAMBERS FOR DOSIMETRY OF ELECTRON-BEAMS - AN EXTENSION OF THE 1983 AAPM PROTOCOL REPORT OF AAPM RADIATION-THERAPY COMMITTEE TASK GROUP NO-39 [J].
ALMOND, PR ;
ATTIX, FH ;
HUMPHRIES, LJ ;
KUBO, H ;
NATH, R ;
GOETSCH, S ;
ROGERS, DWO .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1994, 21 (08) :1251-1260
[2]   AAPM's TG-51 protocol for clinical reference dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams [J].
Almond, PR ;
Biggs, PJ ;
Coursey, BM ;
Hanson, WF ;
Huq, MS ;
Nath, R ;
Rogers, DWO .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1999, 26 (09) :1847-1870
[3]  
Andreo P, 2000, PHYS MED BIOL, V45, pL52, DOI 10.1088/0031-9155/45/11/102
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1993, 49 ICRU
[5]   An analytical approximation of the Bragg curve for therapeutic proton beams [J].
Bortfeld, T .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1997, 24 (12) :2024-2033
[6]  
BOUTILLION M, 1987, CCEMRI OFFILIB VALUE, P85
[7]  
BURNS J, 1998, INTRO NEW NEUROSURGE
[8]  
BUSSIERE M, 2000, COMMUNICATION
[9]  
Chapman P, 1993, STEREOTACTIC RADIOSU, P105
[10]   Proton dosimetry comparison involving ionometry and calorimetry [J].
Delacroix, S ;
Bridier, A ;
Mazal, A ;
Daures, J ;
Ostrowsky, A ;
Nauraye, C ;
Kacperek, A ;
Vynkier, S ;
Brassard, N ;
Habrand, JL .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1997, 37 (03) :711-718