Models to support cropping plan and crop rotation decisions. A review

被引:157
作者
Dury, Jerome [1 ,5 ]
Schaller, Noemie [2 ]
Garcia, Frederick [3 ]
Reynaud, Arnaud [4 ,5 ]
Bergez, Jacques Eric [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] INRA, UMR AGIR 1248, F-31326 Castanet Tolosan, France
[2] AgroParisTech, UMR SADAPT 1048, F-75005 Paris, France
[3] INRA, UMR BIA, F-31326 Castanet Tolosan, France
[4] Univ Toulouse 1, TSE LERNA INRA, F-31042 Toulouse, France
[5] Arvalis Cetiom INRA, UMTeau, F-31450 Baziege, France
关键词
Cropping systems; Decision-making; Modelling; Decision-aid; LAND-USE CHANGE; FARMING SYSTEMS; AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; ACREAGE ALLOCATION; MAKING PROCESSES; SUPPLY RESPONSE; VEGETABLE FARMS; DYNAMIC-MODEL; EXPERT-SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1007/s13593-011-0037-x
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Farmers must yearly allocate fields to different crops and choose crop management options. Far from being obvious, these decisions are critical because they modify farm productivity and profitability in the short and long run. To support farmers and efficiently allocate scarce resources, decision support models are developed. Decision support models are mainly based on two concepts, the cropping plan and the crop rotation decisions. These decisions concern crop choice, crop spatial distribution within the farmland and crop temporal successions over years. Decisions are at the core of the farm management. Decisions have strong impacts on resource use efficiency and on environmental processes at both farm and landscape scales. We review here more than 120 references where cropping plan and crop rotation decision concepts were incorporated into models. Our aim is to review how these two concepts have been formalised and used in agronomic, economic and land-use studies. We found that cropping plan decisions selection and design have been done using many approaches based on different objectives and handled at very different scales. The main results show that (1) cropping plan design decisions have mainly been tackled as a static concept, i.e. as if they were a single decision made only once a year or once a rotation; (2) modelling the achievement of a suitable cropping plan is often based on a single monetary criterion optimization procedure instead of a multi-criteria assessment; and (3) when considered, uncertainty of information is defined as stochastic factors or probability of occurrence, but this probability is kept static whatever the knowledge of the dynamic evolution of various constraints. We argue that cropping plan and crop rotation decisions are on the contrary dynamic processes incorporated into a succession of other planned and adaptive decisions made at annual and long-term horizons. For supporting farmers in their decisions, new cropping plan decision models will require new modelling paradigm. A promising improvement could be reached by including explicitly the simulation of the farmers' decision-making processes, based on the simulation of the decision-making processes rather than on single normative approaches.
引用
收藏
页码:567 / 580
页数:14
相关论文
共 119 条
[21]  
Burel F., 2003, Landscape Ecology, Concepts, Methods and Applications
[22]   The FARMSCAPE approach to decision support: farmers', advisers', researchers' monitoring, simulation, communication and performance evaluation [J].
Carberry, PS ;
Hochman, Z ;
McCown, RL ;
Dalgliesh, NP ;
Foale, MA ;
Poulton, PL ;
Hargreaves, JNG ;
Hargreaves, DMG ;
Cawthray, S ;
Hillcoat, N ;
Robertson, MJ .
AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2002, 74 (01) :141-177
[23]   A systematic representation of crop rotations [J].
Castellazzi, M. S. ;
Wood, G. A. ;
Burgess, P. J. ;
Morris, J. ;
Conrad, K. F. ;
Perry, J. N. .
AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2008, 97 (1-2) :26-33
[24]   New measures and tests of temporal and spatial pattern of crops in agricultural landscapes [J].
Castellazzi, M. S. ;
Perry, J. N. ;
Colbach, N. ;
Monod, H. ;
Adamczyk, K. ;
Viaud, V. ;
Conrad, K. F. .
AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2007, 118 (1-4) :339-349
[25]   ESTIMATING MULTIOUTPUT TECHNOLOGIES [J].
CHAMBERS, RG ;
JUST, RE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1989, 71 (04) :980-995
[26]   ACREAGE DECISIONS UNDER RISK - THE CASE OF CORN AND SOYBEANS [J].
CHAVAS, JP ;
HOLT, MT .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1990, 72 (03) :529-538
[27]   Some issues in the design of agricultural decision support systems [J].
Cox, PG .
AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 1996, 52 (2-3) :355-381
[28]   Agroecology, scaling and interdisciplinarity [J].
Dalgaard, T ;
Hutchings, NJ ;
Porter, JR .
AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2003, 100 (01) :39-51
[29]   Modelling optimal crop sequences using network flows [J].
Detlefsen, Nina K. ;
Jensen, Allan Leck .
AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2007, 94 (02) :566-572
[30]   Exploring profit - Sustainability trade-offs in cropping systems using evolutionary algorithms [J].
deVoil, P. ;
Rossing, W. A. H. ;
Hammer, G. L. .
ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2006, 21 (09) :1368-1374