Preoperative T-staging of prostate carcinoma: Endorectal MRI compared with other imaging and clinical methods.

被引:17
作者
Boni, RAH
Hutter, BE
Trinkler, F
Jochum, W
Pestalozzi, D
Krestin, GP
机构
[1] UNIV SPITAL ZURICH,UROL KLIN,CH-8091 ZURICH,SWITZERLAND
[2] UNIV SPITAL ZURICH,DEPT PATHOL,INST KLIN PATHOL,CH-8091 ZURICH,SWITZERLAND
[3] LIMMATTALSPITAL,UROL KLIN,SCHLIEREN,SWITZERLAND
来源
ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN | 1996年 / 165卷 / 02期
关键词
magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); endorectal surface coil; contrast agent; ultrasound; transrectal; prostate specific antigen (PSA);
D O I
10.1055/s-2007-1015731
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: The diagnostic value of endorectal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in comparison to clinical information and other imaging modalities was analysed in order to define the most accurate preoperative staging method. Methods: 54 patients with biopsy proven prostate carcinoma, who underwent subsequent prostatectomy, were examined with an endorectal surface coil. The results were compared to body coil MRI, digital rectal examination and prostate specific antigen levels. In 37 patients, results of endorectal ultrasound were available. Results: Staging accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of endorectal coil MRI were 83.3%. For body coil MRI, staging accuracy was 59.2%, sensitivity 43.3% and specificity 82.6%, for transrectal ultrasound 59.5%, 36.4% and 91.7% and for the digital rectal examination 55.6%, 26.7% and 91.7%, respectively. Staging accuracy of endorectal MRI was significantly (p < 0,05) superior to that of the other imaging modalities. Conclusion: Endorectal coil MRI allows reliable distinction between localised and advanced tumour stages and is superior to other imaging techniques in this regard. It can thus be recommended for staging in patients with prostate carcinoma.
引用
收藏
页码:152 / 158
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
*AM CANC SOC, 1994, CANC FACTS FIG ATL
[2]   CLINICAL STAGE-B PROSTATE CARCINOMA - STAGING WITH MR IMAGING [J].
BIONDETTI, PR ;
LEE, JKT ;
LING, D ;
CATALONA, WJ .
RADIOLOGY, 1987, 162 (02) :325-329
[3]   CONTRAST-ENHANCED ENDORECTAL COIL MRI IN LOCAL STAGING OF PROSTATE CARCINOMA [J].
BONI, RAH ;
BONER, JA ;
LUTOLF, UM ;
TRINKLER, F ;
PESTALOZZI, DM ;
KRESTIN, GP .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 1995, 19 (02) :232-237
[4]  
CARTER HB, 1988, MULTIDISCIPLINARY AN, P1
[5]   USE OF ENDORECTAL SURFACE COIL MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING FOR LOCAL STAGING OF PROSTATE-CANCER [J].
CHELSKY, MJ ;
SCHNALL, MD ;
SEIDMON, EJ ;
POLLACK, HM .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1993, 150 (02) :391-395
[6]  
DAMICO AV, 1995, CANCER, V75, P2368, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19950501)75:9<2368::AID-CNCR2820750929>3.0.CO
[7]  
2-#
[8]   CANCER WITH ENDORECTAL MR-IMAGING - LESSONS FROM A LEARNING-CURVE [J].
HARRIS, RD ;
SCHNED, AR ;
HEANEY, JA .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 1995, 15 (04) :813-829
[9]   CARCINOMA OF THE PROSTATE-GLAND - MR-IMAGING WITH PELVIC PHASED-ARRAY COILS VERSUS INTEGRATED ENDORECTAL PELVIC PHASED-ARRAY COILS [J].
HRICAK, H ;
WHITE, S ;
VIGNERON, D ;
KURHANEWICZ, J ;
KOSCO, A ;
LEVIN, D ;
WEISS, J ;
NARAYAN, P ;
CARROLL, PR .
RADIOLOGY, 1994, 193 (03) :703-709
[10]   CLINICAL USE OF PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN IN PATIENTS WITH PROSTATE-CANCER [J].
HUDSON, MA ;
BAHNSON, RR ;
CATALONA, WJ .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1989, 142 (04) :1011-1017