Unpacking the Mechanism by which Corporate Responsibility Impacts Stakeholder Relationships

被引:80
作者
Hillenbrand, Carola [1 ]
Money, Kevin [1 ]
Ghobadian, Abby [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Reading, Henley Business Sch, Greenlands RG9 3AU, Henley On Thame, England
关键词
PSYCHOLOGICAL CONTRACT BREACH; SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY; FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE; CUSTOMER SATISFACTION; EMPLOYEE REACTIONS; DECISION-MAKING; CSR; COMMITMENT; MANAGEMENT; REPUTATION;
D O I
10.1111/j.1467-8551.2011.00794.x
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Most research on corporate responsibility (CR) has investigated CR from the perspective of organizations, often focusing on how organizations define, manage and implement CR to gain benefits or competitive advantage. The benefits of CR for organizations are, however, often said to be achieved through increased support of stakeholders. Despite this, limited attention has been given to understanding CR from the perspective of stakeholders and, in particular, the mechanism by which CR drives stakeholder support. This study addresses this deficit. Building on advances in the application of psychological theories to the field of management, the research develops and empirically tests a theoretical model of how CR-related experiences and beliefs drive stakeholder trust and positive intent. The research is conducted with customers (n?=?708) and employees (n?=?359) of a service organization in the UK that introduced a range of CR-related activities into their business. The findings contribute to literature by empirically demonstrating (a) the impact of CR-related experiences on the development of beliefs about, and trust towards, the organization; (b) the importance of others-related CR experiences even in the presence of self-related CR experiences; and (c) the role of beliefs as partial mediators in how experiences of CR, both self-related and others-related, translate into trust and positive intent.
引用
收藏
页码:127 / 146
页数:20
相关论文
共 153 条
[21]   Strengthening Stakeholder-Company Relationships Through Mutually Beneficial Corporate Social Responsibility Initiatives [J].
Bhattacharya, C. B. ;
Korschun, Daniel ;
Sen, Sankar .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2009, 85 :257-272
[22]   What corporate social responsibility activities are valued by the market? [J].
Bird, Ron ;
Hall, Anthony D. ;
Momente, Francesco ;
Reggiani, Francesco .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2007, 76 (02) :189-206
[23]  
Bollen K. A., 1989, Structural equations with latent variables
[24]  
Brammer S., 2004, BUSINESS ETHICS EURO, V13, DOI [DOI 10.1111/J.1467-8608.2004.00356.X, 10.1111/j.1467-8608.2004.00356.x]
[25]  
Brammer S., 2005, Journal of Corporate Citizenship, V20, P39, DOI DOI 10.9774/GLEAF.4700.2005.WI.00007
[26]   Corporate reputation and social performance: The importance of fit [J].
Brammer, SJ ;
Pavelin, S .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2006, 43 (03) :435-455
[27]   The contribution of corporate social responsibility to organizational commitment [J].
Brammer, Stephen ;
Millington, Andrew ;
Rayton, Bruce .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, 2007, 18 (10) :1701-1719
[28]  
Brown D., 2003, PEOPLE MANAGEMENT, P21
[29]   How the Opinion of Others Affects Our Valuation of Objects [J].
Campbell-Meiklejohn, Daniel K. ;
Bach, Dominik R. ;
Roepstorff, Andreas ;
Dolan, Raymond J. ;
Frith, Chris D. .
CURRENT BIOLOGY, 2010, 20 (13) :1165-1170
[30]   The Business Case for Corporate Social Responsibility: A Review of Concepts, Research and Practice [J].
Carroll, Archie B. ;
Shabana, Kareem M. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT REVIEWS, 2010, 12 (01) :85-105