Evaluation of cystic ovarian lesions using apparent diffusion coefficient calculated from reordered turboflash MR images

被引:25
作者
Moteki, T [1 ]
Ishizaka, H [1 ]
机构
[1] Gunma Univ Hosp, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Maebashi, Gumma 371, Japan
关键词
rapid MRI; pelvis; neoplasm; diffusion-perfusion;
D O I
10.1016/S0730-725X(99)00036-3
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Reordered snapshot fast low-angle shot images with, and without, diffusion-perfusion gradients were used for the evaluation of contents of cystic ovarian lesions. Sonographically detected 51 cystic ovarian lesions (13 endometrial cysts, 17 ovarian cysts, 7 serous cystadenomas, 6 mucinous cystadenomas, 8 malignant cystic ovarian tumors) were studied. T-1- and T-2-weighted images, reordered snapshot fast low-angle shot images with and without diffusion-perfusion gradients (b = 106 and 0 s/mm(2), respectively) were obtained. Using these images, apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) were calculated in the cystic contents of these lesions, Endometrial cysts and malignant cystic ovarian tumors showed lower ADC values than ovarian cysts, serous cystadenomas and mucinous cystadenomas (p < 0.02). There was no distinct ADC difference among ovarian cysts, serous cystadenomas, mucinous cystadenomas (p > 0.2). In conclusion, diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging is possible to be useful to evaluate cystic contents of ovarian lesions. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:955 / 963
页数:9
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   The hydration of proteins in solutions by self-diffusion coefficients NMR study [J].
Baranowska, HM ;
Olszewski, KJ .
BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA-GENERAL SUBJECTS, 1996, 1289 (03) :312-314
[2]  
BROSIO E, 1994, CELL MOL BIOL, V40, P569
[3]   A comparison between different imaging strategies for diffusion measurements with the centric phase-encoded turboFLASH sequence [J].
Coremans, J ;
Spanoghe, M ;
Budinsky, L ;
Sterckx, J ;
Luypaert, R ;
Eisendrath, H ;
Osteaux, M .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE, 1997, 124 (02) :323-342
[4]  
ELSTER AD, 1993, RADIOLOGY, V186, P1
[5]   EPITHELIAL TUMORS OF THE OVARY - COMPARISON OF MR AND CT FINDINGS [J].
GHOSSAIN, MA ;
BUY, JN ;
LIGNERES, C ;
BAZOT, M ;
HASSEN, K ;
MALBEC, L ;
HUGOL, D ;
TRUC, JB ;
DECROIX, Y ;
POITOUT, P ;
VADROT, D .
RADIOLOGY, 1991, 181 (03) :863-870
[6]   Measurement of diffusion constants for nucleic acids by NMR [J].
Lapham, J ;
Rife, JP ;
Moore, PB ;
Crothers, DM .
JOURNAL OF BIOMOLECULAR NMR, 1997, 10 (03) :255-262
[7]   SEPARATION OF DIFFUSION AND PERFUSION IN INTRAVOXEL INCOHERENT MOTION MR IMAGING [J].
LEBIHAN, D ;
BRETON, E ;
LALLEMAND, D ;
AUBIN, ML ;
VIGNAUD, J ;
LAVALJEANTET, M .
RADIOLOGY, 1988, 168 (02) :497-505
[8]   DIFFUSION MR IMAGING - CLINICAL-APPLICATIONS [J].
LEBIHAN, D ;
TURNER, R ;
DOUEK, P ;
PATRONAS, N .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1992, 159 (03) :591-599
[9]   ADNEXAL MASSES - MR IMAGING OBSERVATIONS AT 1.5 T, WITH US AND CT CORRELATION [J].
MITCHELL, DG ;
MINTZ, MC ;
SPRITZER, CE ;
GUSSMAN, D ;
ARGER, PH ;
COLEMAN, BG ;
AXEL, L ;
KRESSEL, HY .
RADIOLOGY, 1987, 162 (02) :319-324
[10]   DIFFERENTIATION BETWEEN HEMANGIOMAS AND HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMAS WITH THE APPARENT DIFFUSION-COEFFICIENT CALCULATED FROM TURBOFLASH MR-IMAGES [J].
MOTEKI, T ;
ISHIZAKA, H ;
HORIKOSHI, H ;
MATSUMOTO, M .
JMRI-JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 1995, 5 (02) :187-191