Renal cell carcinoma: new prognostic factors?

被引:25
作者
Kirkali, Z
Lekili, M
机构
[1] Dokuz Eylul Univ, Sch Med, Dept Urol, TR-35340 Izmir, Turkey
[2] Celal Bayer Univ, Sch Med, Dept Urol, Manisa, Turkey
关键词
grade; prognosis; renal cell carcinoma; stage; RADICAL NEPHRECTOMY; GROWTH-FACTOR; TUMOR STAGE; HEIDELBERG CLASSIFICATION; PATHOLOGICAL FEATURES; NUCLEAR MORPHOMETRY; VASCULAR INVASION; PATIENT SURVIVAL; OVER-EXPRESSION; GRADE;
D O I
10.1097/00042307-200311000-00002
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose of review There are limited independent predictors of survival in patients with renal cell carcinoma. Factors related to the tumor, host and treatment may help us to predict prognosis to a certain extent. Prognostic indicators would enable selection of patients who can benefit from adjuvant therapy and thus should be enrolled in clinical trials. This review highlights developments in the identification of current prognosticators for patients with renal cell carcinoma. Recent findings Tumor stage, grade and patient-performance status are the known prognostic indicators in renal cell carcinoma. Besides these parameters, many molecular and cytogenetic markers were evaluated recently. Unfortunately, none of these parameters appear to be a better predictive prognostic factor than the usual staging and grading. Therefore, efforts to identify new markers for tumor proliferation and progression are still ongoing. It was recently reported that low carbonic anhydrase 9 staining may be an independent poor prognostic factor in patients with renal cell carcinoma. Moreover, there is increasing interest in prognostic indices and predictive algorithms for survival. Staging systems that combine the pathological features with additional prognostic variables have been constructed to predict outcome. The UCLA Integrated Staging System seems to be superior to staging alone in differentiating patients' survival. Summary Although the literature reviewed contains numerous promising clinical, histological, molecular and cytogenetic parameters, none of them has yet been shown to have an independent prognostic value.
引用
收藏
页码:433 / 438
页数:6
相关论文
共 82 条
  • [61] Kidney pathology: Current classification of renal cell carcinoma
    Said J.W.
    Thomas G.
    Zisman A.
    [J]. Current Urology Reports, 2002, 3 (1) : 25 - 30
  • [62] Expression of bcl-2, p53 oncoprotein, and proliferating cell nuclear antigen in renal cell carcinoma
    Sejima, T
    Miyagawa, I
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 1999, 35 (03) : 242 - 248
  • [63] Prognostic significance of microvascular invasion in localized renal cell carcinoma
    Sevinc, M
    Kirkali, Z
    Yörükoglu, K
    Mungan, U
    Sade, M
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2000, 38 (06) : 728 - 733
  • [64] SKINNER DG, 1971, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V28, P1165, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(1971)28:5<1165::AID-CNCR2820280513>3.0.CO
  • [65] 2-G
  • [66] SOBIN LH, 2002, UICC TM CLASSIFICATI
  • [67] Incidentally detected renal cell carcinoma: Pathological features, survival trends and implications for treatment
    Sweeney, JP
    Thornhill, JA
    Grainger, R
    McDermott, TED
    Butler, MR
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1996, 78 (03): : 351 - 353
  • [68] Biological significance of c-met over expression in papillary renal cell carcinoma
    Sweeney, P
    El-Naggar, AK
    Lin, SH
    Pisters, LL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 168 (01) : 51 - 55
  • [69] Prognostic indicators for renal cell carcinoma: A multivariate analysis of 643 patients using the revised 1997 TNM staging criteria
    Tsui, KH
    Shvarts, O
    Smith, RB
    Figlin, RA
    deKernion, JB
    Belldegrun, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2000, 163 (04) : 1090 - 1095
  • [70] Metallothionein expression in renal cell carcinoma:: Subcellular localization and prognostic significance
    Tüzel, E
    Kirkali, Z
    Yörükoglu, K
    Mungan, MU
    Sade, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2001, 165 (05) : 1710 - 1713