Temporal and geographical variation in UK obstetricians' personal preference regarding mode of delivery

被引:33
作者
Groom, KM [1 ]
Paterson-Brown, S [1 ]
Fisk, NM [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, Queen Charlottes & Chelsea Hosp, Inst Reprod & Dev Biol,Sch Med, Dept Maternal & Fetal Med, London W12 0NN, England
来源
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY | 2002年 / 100卷 / 02期
关键词
UK obstetricians; mode of delivery; caesarean section;
D O I
10.1016/S0301-2115(01)00468-7
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To assess UK obstetricians' preferences about mode of delivery for themselves or their partners and determine whether these changed since 1995. Study Design: All 313 registered obstetricians in London and one in five (279) sample of those outside London were sent a structured anonymous postal questionnaire. Results: The response rate was 54%. In a hypothetical uncomplicated first singleton pregnancy with a cephalic presentation at term, 15% chose elective caesarean section (CS) (17% in London versus 13% outside London). The overall rate for London has not changed since 1995 (17 versus 17%), although the difference between women and men was less (31 versus 8% in 1995 and 21 versus 14% in 1999, respectively). The number choosing elective CS increased with estimated foetal weight >4.0 kg (40%) and >4.5 kg (65%) and with breech presentation both in a first pregnancy (69%) and after a previous vaginal delivery (49%). Conclusion: The overall attitude of London obstetricians to mode of delivery for themselves or their partners has not changed since 1995 and is similar to those of UK obstetricians elsewhere. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:185 / 188
页数:4
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   Obstetricians' personal choice and mode of delivery [J].
AlMufti, R ;
McCarthy, A ;
Fisk, NM .
LANCET, 1996, 347 (9000) :544-544
[2]   Survey of obstetricians' personal preference and discretionary practice [J].
AlMufti, R ;
McCarthy, A ;
Fisk, NM .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 1997, 73 (01) :1-4
[3]   Rates and implications of caesarean sections in Latin America:: ecological study [J].
Belizán, JM ;
Althabe, F ;
Barros, FC ;
Alexander, S .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1999, 319 (7222) :1397-1400
[4]   Obstetricians' views on caesarean section versus vaginal birth [J].
Bewley, S .
LANCET, 1996, 347 (9009) :1189-1189
[5]   Obstetricians say yes to maternal request for elective caesarean section: a survey of current opinion [J].
Cotzias, CS ;
Paterson-Brown, S ;
Fisk, NM .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2001, 97 (01) :15-16
[6]  
Department of Health, 1993, CHANG CHILDB REP EXP
[7]   Obstetricians' choice of delivery [J].
Gabbe, SG ;
Holzman, GB .
LANCET, 2001, 357 (9257) :722-722
[8]  
GILBERT S, 1998, NY TIMES 0922
[9]   The rise in caesarean section rate: the same indications but a lower threshold [J].
Leitch, CR ;
Walker, JJ .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1998, 105 (06) :621-626
[10]   Health sector reform and rise of caesarean birth in Chile [J].
Murray, SF ;
Pradenas, FS .
LANCET, 1997, 349 (9044) :64-64