Conference report and review:: Current status of biomarkers potentially associated with prostate cancer outcomes

被引:8
作者
Flaig, Thomas W.
Nordeen, Steven K.
Lucia, M. Scott
Harrison, Gail S.
Glode, L. Michael
机构
[1] Univ Colorado Denver & Hlth Sci Univ, Dept Med, Aurora, CO USA
[2] Univ Colorado Denver & Hlth Sci Univ, Dept Pathol, Aurora, CO USA
关键词
prostate; prostatic neoplasms; tumor markers; biological; proteomics; genomics;
D O I
10.1016/j.juro.2006.11.032
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: The use of prostate specific antigen screening to diagnose and monitor prostate cancer is associated with well-known shortcomings. A 2-day Prostate Cancer Biomarker Conference was convened to identify promising areas of research and focus efforts on the most critical needs. Materials and Methods: The conference provided a forum for the presentation and discussion of ongoing prostate cancer biomarker research. This meeting also sought to identify a range of critical issues in the development and validation of biomarkers, foster research collaboration between groups representing government, academic and industry initiatives, and coordinate efforts with planned and ongoing clinical trials. Results: Taken collectively the conference presentations offered various new technologies for biomarker discovery and pathological assessment of clinical disease as well as the promise of biomarkers for improving prostate cancer diagnosis and treatment decisions. However, research efforts focused on biomarker validation and implementation clearly lag behind those directed toward initial biomarker discovery. It is apparent that guidelines are desperately needed to ensure the consistency of sample collection across institutions. Conclusions: Several ongoing and planned adjuvant prostate cancer trials will provide a tremendous opportunity for biological sample collection along with the potential to validate many biomarkers. Practicing urologists have an opportunity to have a critical role in the successful accrual of patients into these trials.
引用
收藏
页码:1229 / 1237
页数:9
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
*AM CANC SOC, 2006, CANC FACTS FIG 2006
[2]   Comparative effects of DHEA vs. testosterone, dihydrotestosterone, and estradiol on proliferation and gene expression in human LNCaP prostate cancer cells [J].
Arnold, JT ;
Le, H ;
McFann, KK ;
Blackman, MR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-ENDOCRINOLOGY AND METABOLISM, 2005, 288 (03) :E573-E584
[3]   Proteomics in prostate cancer [J].
Bañez, LL ;
Srivastava, S ;
Moul, JW .
CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2005, 15 (03) :151-156
[5]   Plasma insulin-like growth factor I and prostate cancer risk: A prospective study [J].
Chan, JM ;
Stampfer, MJ ;
Giovannucci, E ;
Gann, PH ;
Ma, J ;
Wilkinson, P ;
Hennekens, CH ;
Pollak, M .
SCIENCE, 1998, 279 (5350) :563-566
[6]  
Chatterjee Sabarni K, 2005, Future Oncol, V1, P37, DOI 10.1517/14796694.1.1.37
[7]   Prospective identification of tumorigenic prostate cancer stem cells [J].
Collins, AT ;
Berry, PA ;
Hyde, C ;
Stower, MJ ;
Maitland, NJ .
CANCER RESEARCH, 2005, 65 (23) :10946-10951
[8]   Prostate cancer molecular markers GSTP1 and hTERT in expressed prostatic secretions as predictors of biopsy results [J].
Crocitto, LE ;
Korns, D ;
Kretzner, L ;
Shevchuk, T ;
Blair, SL ;
Wilson, TG ;
Ramin, SA ;
Kawachi, MH ;
Smith, SS .
UROLOGY, 2004, 64 (04) :821-825
[9]   Pharmacogenetics of tamoxifen biotransformation is associated with clinical outcomes of efficacy and hot flashes [J].
Goetz, MP ;
Rae, JM ;
Suman, VJ ;
Safgren, SL ;
Ames, MM ;
Visscher, DW ;
Reynolds, C ;
Couch, FJ ;
Lingle, WL ;
Flockhart, DA ;
Desta, Z ;
Perez, EA ;
Ingle, JN .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 23 (36) :9312-9318
[10]   Molecular classification of cancer: Class discovery and class prediction by gene expression monitoring [J].
Golub, TR ;
Slonim, DK ;
Tamayo, P ;
Huard, C ;
Gaasenbeek, M ;
Mesirov, JP ;
Coller, H ;
Loh, ML ;
Downing, JR ;
Caligiuri, MA ;
Bloomfield, CD ;
Lander, ES .
SCIENCE, 1999, 286 (5439) :531-537