Texture analysis in assessment and prediction of chemotherapy response in breast cancer

被引:180
作者
Ahmed, Arfan [1 ]
Gibbs, Peter [1 ]
Pickles, Martin [1 ]
Turnbull, Lindsay [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hull, Ctr Magnet Resonance Invest, Kingston Upon Hull HU3 2JZ, N Humberside, England
关键词
texture analysis software; Haralick co-occurrence matrices; MRI contrast enhancement; breast cancer chemotherapy prediction; image processing; computer science informatics; ENHANCED MR-IMAGES; NEOADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY; TISSUE CHARACTERIZATION; CLASSIFICATION; LESIONS; TUMORS; GENE; SPECTROSCOPY; MAMMOGRAPHY; FEATURES;
D O I
10.1002/jmri.23971
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To assess the efficacy of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI)-based textural analysis in predicting response to chemotherapy in a cohort of breast cancer patients. Materials and Methods: In all, 100 patients were scanned on a 3.0T HDx scanner immediately prior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy treatment. A software application to use texture features based on co-occurrence matrices was developed. Texture analysis was performed on precontrast and 1-5 minutes postcontrast data. Patients were categorized according to their chemotherapeutic response: partial responders corresponding to a decrease in tumor diameter over 50% (40) and nonresponders corresponding to a decrease of less than 50% (4). Data were also split based on factors that influence response: triple receptor negative phenotype (TNBC) (22) vs. nonTNBC (49); node negative (45) vs. node positive (46); and biopsy grade 1 or 2 (38) vs. biopsy grade 3 (55). Results: Parameters f(2) (contrast), f(4) (variance), f(10) (difference in variance), f(6) (sum average), f(7) (sum variance), f(8) (sum entropy), f(15) (cluster shade), and f(16) (cluster prominence) showed significant differences between responders and partial responders of chemotherapy. Differences were mainly seen at 1-3 minutes postcontrast administration. No significant differences were found precontrast administration. Node ive, high grade, and TNBC are associated with poorer prognosis and appear to be more heterogeneous in appearance according to texture analysis. Conclusion: This work highlights that textural differences between groups (based on response, nodal status, and triple negative groupings) are apparent and appear to be most evident 1-3 minutes postcontrast administration. The fact that significant differences for certain texture parameters and groupings are consistently observed is encouraging.
引用
收藏
页码:89 / 101
页数:13
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Textural Kinetics: A Novel Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced (DCE)-MRI Feature for Breast Lesion Classification [J].
Agner, Shannon C. ;
Soman, Salil ;
Libfeld, Edward ;
McDonald, Margie ;
Thomas, Kathleen ;
Englander, Sarah ;
Rosen, Mark A. ;
Chin, Deanna ;
Nosher, John ;
Madabhushi, Anant .
JOURNAL OF DIGITAL IMAGING, 2011, 24 (03) :446-463
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2008, WORLD CANC REPORT
[3]   Cancerous Breast Lesions on Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MR Images: Computerized Characterization for Image-based Prognostic Markers [J].
Bhooshan, Neha ;
Giger, Maryellen L. ;
Jansen, Sanaz A. ;
Li, Hui ;
Lan, Li ;
Newstead, Gillian M. .
RADIOLOGY, 2010, 254 (03) :680-690
[4]  
Cancer research UK, 2011, CANC STATS KEY FACTS
[5]   Volumetric texture analysis of breast lesions on contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance images [J].
Chen, Weijie ;
Giger, Maryellen L. ;
Li, Hui ;
Bick, Ulrich ;
Newstead, Gillian M. .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2007, 58 (03) :562-571
[6]   SEGMENTATION OF A HIGH-RESOLUTION URBAN SCENE USING TEXTURE OPERATORS [J].
CONNERS, RW ;
TRIVEDI, MM ;
HARLOW, CA .
COMPUTER VISION GRAPHICS AND IMAGE PROCESSING, 1984, 25 (03) :273-310
[7]   Improvement in breast lesion characterization with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI using pharmacokinetic modeling and bookend T1 measurements [J].
Cron, GO ;
Kelcz, F ;
Santyr, GE .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2004, 51 (05) :1066-1070
[8]   New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1) [J].
Eisenhauer, E. A. ;
Therasse, P. ;
Bogaerts, J. ;
Schwartz, L. H. ;
Sargent, D. ;
Ford, R. ;
Dancey, J. ;
Arbuck, S. ;
Gwyther, S. ;
Mooney, M. ;
Rubinstein, L. ;
Shankar, L. ;
Dodd, L. ;
Kaplan, R. ;
Lacombe, D. ;
Verweij, J. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2009, 45 (02) :228-247
[9]   MR image texture analysis applied to the diagnosis and tracking of Alzheimer's disease [J].
Freeborough, PA ;
Fox, NC .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 1998, 17 (03) :475-479
[10]   Textural analysis of contrast-enhanced MR images of the breast [J].
Gibbs, P ;
Turnbull, LW .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2003, 50 (01) :92-98