Improvement in breast lesion characterization with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI using pharmacokinetic modeling and bookend T1 measurements

被引:27
作者
Cron, GO
Kelcz, F
Santyr, GE
机构
[1] Carleton Univ, Dept Phys, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, Canada
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Radiol, Madison, WI 53706 USA
关键词
magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); breast cancer; gadolinium contrast agent;
D O I
10.1002/mrm.20042
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging was performed on 14 patients (five cancerous lesions, nine benign) with slice-selective spoiled gradient-recalled echo (2D SPGR) imaging. Adiabatic saturation recovery T-1 measurements were performed before (T-1pre) and after (T-1post) 2D SPGR imaging. These two "book-end" T-1 measurements were used to calibrate the equations which were employed to convert the time course of the 2D SPGR signal strength to T-1-vs.-time, which in turn was used to compute the gadolinium concentration-vs.-time ([C](t)) in the lesion. The extraction-flow product (EF) was computed for each lesion by pharmacokinetic modeling of [C](t). For this study, EF provided a sensitivity and specificity for cancer of 100% and 78%, respectively. When only T-1pre was used to estimate [C](t) (which assumes a priori knowledge of the shape and amplitude of the slice profile), the sensitivity and specificity fell to 80% and 56%, respectively. This is presumably due to unexpected variations in the shape and/or amplitude of the slice profile, which could be caused by factors such as patient-to-patient variations in breast geometry or inconsistently set transmit gains. Therefore, both T-1pre and T-1post measurements are necessary for optimum sensitivity and specificity using pharmacokinetic analysis. (C) 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1066 / 1070
页数:5
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   UNIFORM SAMPLE EXCITATION WITH SURFACE COILS FOR INVIVO SPECTROSCOPY BY ADIABATIC RAPID HALF PASSAGE [J].
BENDALL, MR ;
PEGG, DT .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE, 1986, 67 (02) :376-381
[2]   Measurement of spin-lattice relaxation times with FLASH for dynamic MRI of the breast [J].
Brookes, JA ;
Redpath, TW ;
Gilbert, FJ ;
Needham, G ;
Murray, AD .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1996, 69 (819) :206-214
[3]   Magnetic resonance imaging screening in women at genetic risk of breast cancer: imaging and analysis protocol for the UK multicentre study [J].
Brown, J ;
Buckley, D ;
Coulthard, A ;
Dixon, AK ;
Dixon, JM ;
Easton, DF ;
Eeles, RA ;
Evans, DGR ;
Gilbert, FG ;
Graves, M ;
Hayes, C ;
Jenkins, JPR ;
Jones, AP ;
Keevil, SF ;
Leach, MO ;
Liney, GP ;
Moss, SM ;
Padhani, AR ;
Parker, GJM ;
Pointon, LJ ;
Ponder, BAJ ;
Redpath, TW ;
Sloane, JP ;
Turnbull, LW ;
Walker, LG ;
Warren, RML .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2000, 18 (07) :765-776
[4]  
Cron GO, 1999, MAGNET RESON MED, V42, P746, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2594(199910)42:4<746::AID-MRM17>3.0.CO
[5]  
2-U
[6]   STUDIES OF GD-DTPA RELAXIVITY AND PROTON-EXCHANGE RATES IN TISSUE [J].
DONAHUE, KM ;
BURSTEIN, D ;
MANNING, WJ ;
GRAY, ML .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1994, 32 (01) :66-76
[7]   Water diffusion and exchange as they influence contrast enhancement [J].
Donahue, KM ;
Weisskoff, RM ;
Burstein, D .
JMRI-JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 1997, 7 (01) :102-110
[8]   Measurement of the arterial concentration of Gd-DTPA using MRI: A step toward quantitative perfusion imaging [J].
FritzHansen, T ;
Rostrup, E ;
Larsson, HBW ;
Sondergaard, L ;
Ring, P ;
Henriksen, O .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1996, 36 (02) :225-231
[9]   A fast 3D Look-Locker method for volumetric T1 mapping [J].
Henderson, E ;
McKinnon, G ;
Lee, TY ;
Rutt, BK .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 1999, 17 (08) :1163-1171
[10]   Temporal sampling requirements for the tracer kinetics modeling of breast disease [J].
Henderson, E ;
Rutt, BK ;
Lee, TY .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 1998, 16 (09) :1057-1073