Predictors of lower endoscopy use among patients at three inner-city neighborhood health centers

被引:25
作者
Zimmerman, RK
Tabbarah, M
Trauth, J
Nowalk, MP
Ricci, EM
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Med, Dept Family Med & Clin Epidemiol, Pittsburgh, PA 15261 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Grad Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Behav Sci & Community Hlth, Pittsburgh, PA USA
来源
JOURNAL OF URBAN HEALTH-BULLETIN OF THE NEW YORK ACADEMY OF MEDICINE | 2006年 / 83卷 / 02期
基金
美国医疗保健研究与质量局; 美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
cancer screening; colorectal cancer; health services research;
D O I
10.1007/s11524-005-9028-z
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Although colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer death in the U.S., screening rates are low. Understanding the Predictors of CRC screening is needed. In 2003, a random sample of patients aged 50 and over from three inner-city health centers was surveyed by computer-assisted telephone interview concerning CRC screening. The questionnaire was based on the Transtheoretical Model and the Theory of Reasoned Action. Factor analysis with Varimax rotation and logistic regression analyses were conducted. Of 319 surveys with data about endoscopy, 148 (46%) met guidelines (19 reported sigmoidoscopy within 5 years, 105 reported colonoscopy within 10 years, and 24 reported both within 5 years). Factor analysis identified three factors associated with increased likelihood of lower endoscopy within guidelines: Social Influence for CRC Screening (Eigenvalue 1.73), Barriers to Lower Endoscopy (Eigenvalue 2.00), and Lower Endoscopy Benefit/Ease (Eigenvalue 1.19). Variables in logistic regression associated with a lower rate of endoscopy include being African American (Odds Ratio (OR)=0.35, 95% confidence interval=0.13-0.96), being a current smoker (OR=0.13, CI=0.03-0.60), and having a higher score on the Barriers to Lower Endoscopy (actor (i.e., viewed the inconvenience and unpleasant aspects as more troubling, OR=0.33, CI=0.18-0.60). The perceived inconvenience and unpleasant aspects of lower endoscopy are substantial barriers to screening. Advances in colon preparation procedures and better educational campaigns might lessen this perceived barrier and may be particularly important in disadvantaged and African American communities.
引用
收藏
页码:221 / 230
页数:10
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], AT RISK DRINK ILL DR
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1989, DESIGNING CONDUCTING
[3]  
Baier M, 2000, CANCER EPIDEM BIOMAR, V9, P229
[4]   Barriers to colorectal cancer screening among ethnically diverse high- and average-risk individuals [J].
Bastani, R ;
Gallardo, NV ;
Maxwell, AE .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOCIAL ONCOLOGY, 2001, 19 (3-4) :65-84
[5]   Colorectal cancer screening in older men and women: Qualitative research findings and implications for intervention [J].
Beeker, C ;
Kraft, JM ;
Southwell, BG ;
Jorgensen, CM .
JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2000, 25 (03) :263-278
[6]  
*CDCP, 2005, COL CANC SCREEN ACC
[7]  
*CDCP, 2001, CANC DAT SIT RAC
[8]  
DeVellis R., 2017, SCALE DEV THEORY APP
[9]   Comparison of reduced volume Versus four liters sulfate-free electrolyte lavage solutions for colonoscopy colon cleansing [J].
DiPalma, JA ;
Wolff, BG ;
Meagher, A ;
Cleveland, MV .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2003, 98 (10) :2187-2191
[10]   Colorectal cancer screening: Physician recommendation is influential advice to Marylanders [J].
Gilbert, A ;
Kanarek, N .
PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2005, 41 (02) :367-379