Comparison of reduced volume Versus four liters sulfate-free electrolyte lavage solutions for colonoscopy colon cleansing

被引:130
作者
DiPalma, JA
Wolff, BG
Meagher, A
Cleveland, MV
机构
[1] Univ S Alabama, Coll Med, Div Gastroenterol, Mobile, AL 36693 USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Dept Surg, Rochester, MN USA
[3] Briantree Labs, Braintree, MA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0002-9270(03)00696-8
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVE: In an attempt to improve patient tolerance for colonoscopy cleansing, a reduced volume lavage regimen with 2 L sulfate-free electrolyte lavage solution (SF-ELS, Nu-LYTELY, Braintree Laboratories, Braintree, MA) plus 20 mg p.o. bisacodyl (Half Lytely, Braintree Laboratories) was compared with standard 4 L SF-ELS lavage for safety and efficacy. METHODS: At two centers, 200 patients undergoing colonoscopy for routine indications were randomized to receive the reduced volume or standard 4 L method. The day before scheduled colonoscopy, study subjects were allowed a normal breakfast and clear liquids for lunch and dinner. Those randomized to receive the reduced volume method received four 5-mg bisacodyl tablets p.o. at noon. Six hours later, they received 2 L SF-ELS given as 10 oz every 10 min. Subjects randomized to receive 4 L SF-ELS also drank their solution at 6:00 PM in a similar fashion. Colonoscopists, unaware as to the randomized preparation received, rated efficacy of cleansing. Patient tolerance and various hematological and biochemical parameters were assessed. RESULTS: Physician assessment of colon cleansing showed no differences between those patients randomized to receive reduced volume (n = 93) or 4 L (n = 93) SF-ELS cleansing (p = 0.16). There was a profound reduction in preparation side effects. The reduced volume preparation had less fullness (p < 0.01), nausea (p < 0.01), vomiting (p = 0.01), and overall discomfort (p < 0.01). There were no clinically significant changes in hematology or blood chemistry associated with either preparation. CONCLUSIONS: Reduced volume preparation with 2 L SF-ELS and bisacodyl is safe and effective. Clinical symptoms from the reduced volume preparation are significantly reduced compared with traditional 4 L gut lavage.
引用
收藏
页码:2187 / 2191
页数:5
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
ADAMS WJ, 1994, DIS COLON RECTUM, V37, P229, DOI 10.1007/BF02048160
[2]   A novel tableted purgative for colonoscopic preparation: efficacy and safety comparisons with Colyte and Fleet Phospho-Soda [J].
Aronchick, CA ;
Lipshutz, WH ;
Wright, SH ;
Dufrayne, F ;
Bergman, G .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2000, 52 (03) :346-352
[3]  
BECK DE, 1991, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V126, P552
[4]  
BERRY MA, 1994, ALIMENT PHARM THERAP, V8, P391
[5]  
BRADY CE, 1987, ANN CLIN RES, V19, P34
[6]   The curse of poor bowel preparation for colonoscopy [J].
Byrne, MF .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2002, 97 (07) :1587-1590
[7]   Use of oral sodium phosphate colonic lavage solution by Canadian colonoscopists: Pitfalls and complications [J].
Chan, A ;
Depew, W ;
Vanner, S .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1997, 11 (04) :334-338
[8]  
DAVIS GR, 1980, GASTROENTEROLOGY, V78, P991
[9]  
DIPALMA JA, 1984, GASTROENTEROLOGY, V86, P856
[10]   Biochemical effects of oral sodium phosphate [J].
DiPalma, JA ;
Buckley, SE ;
Warner, BA ;
Culpepper, RM .
DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 1996, 41 (04) :749-753