Performance and cost analysis of future, commercially mature gasification-based electric power generation from switchgrass

被引:61
作者
Jin, Haiming [2 ]
Larson, Eric D. [1 ]
Celik, Fuat E. [3 ]
机构
[1] Princeton Univ, Princeton Environm Inst, Energy Syst Anal Grp, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
[2] SNC Lavalin, Houston, TX USA
[3] Univ Calif Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
来源
BIOFUELS BIOPRODUCTS & BIOREFINING-BIOFPR | 2009年 / 3卷 / 02期
关键词
switchgrass; IGCC; gasification; SOFC; Rankine cycle; BIOMASS GASIFICATION; KAOLIN; COAL; AIR;
D O I
10.1002/bbb.138
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Detailed process designs and mass/energy balances are developed using a consistent modeling framework and input parameter assumptions for biomass-based power generation at large scale (4536 dry metric tonnes per day switchgrass input), assuming future commercially mature component equipment performance levels. The simulated systems include two gasification-based gas turbine combined cycles (B-IGCC) designed around different gasifier technologies, one gasification-based solid oxide fuel cell cycle (B-IGSOFC), and a steam-Rankine cycle. The simulated design-point efficiency of the B-IGSOFC is the highest among all systems (51.8%, LHV basis), with modestly lower efficiencies for the B-IGCC design using a pressurized, oxygen-blown gasifier (49.5% LHV) and for the B-IGCC design using a low-pressure indirectly heated gasifier (48.6%, LHV). The steam-Rankine system has a simulated efficiency of 33.0% (LHV). Detailed capital costs are estimated assuming commercially mature ('N-th plant') technologies for the two B-IGCC and the steam-Rankine systems. B-IGCC systems are more capital-intensive than the steam-Rankine system, but discounted cash flow rate of return calculations highlight the total cost advantage of the B-IGCC systems when biomass prices are higher. Uncertainties regarding prospective mature-technology costs for solid oxide fuel cells and hot gas sulfur clean-up technologies assumed for the B-IGSOFC performance analysis make it difficult to evaluate the prospective electricity generating costs for B-IGSOFC relative to B-IGCC. The rough analysis here suggests that B-IGSOFC will not show improved economics relative to B-IGCC at the large scale considered here. (C) 2009 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
引用
收藏
页码:142 / 173
页数:32
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1996, BIOMASS, DOI DOI 10.2172/419974
[3]  
BAIN RL, 2003, NRELTP51033132
[4]  
*BECHT, 1998, ASP PROC FLOW SHEET
[5]  
Bergman P. C., 2002, PYR GAS BIOM WAST EX
[6]  
BROOKS FJ, 2000, GER3567H GE POW SYST
[7]   Thermodynamic model and parametric analysis of a tubular SOFC module [J].
Campanari, S .
JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES, 2001, 92 (1-2) :26-34
[8]  
CAMPANARI S, 1998, INT GAS TURB AER C S
[9]  
*COUNC EC ADV, 2004, EC IND
[10]  
Council N.R., 2004, HYDROGEN EC OPPORTUN