Performance and cost analysis of future, commercially mature gasification-based electric power generation from switchgrass

被引:61
作者
Jin, Haiming [2 ]
Larson, Eric D. [1 ]
Celik, Fuat E. [3 ]
机构
[1] Princeton Univ, Princeton Environm Inst, Energy Syst Anal Grp, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
[2] SNC Lavalin, Houston, TX USA
[3] Univ Calif Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
来源
BIOFUELS BIOPRODUCTS & BIOREFINING-BIOFPR | 2009年 / 3卷 / 02期
关键词
switchgrass; IGCC; gasification; SOFC; Rankine cycle; BIOMASS GASIFICATION; KAOLIN; COAL; AIR;
D O I
10.1002/bbb.138
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Detailed process designs and mass/energy balances are developed using a consistent modeling framework and input parameter assumptions for biomass-based power generation at large scale (4536 dry metric tonnes per day switchgrass input), assuming future commercially mature component equipment performance levels. The simulated systems include two gasification-based gas turbine combined cycles (B-IGCC) designed around different gasifier technologies, one gasification-based solid oxide fuel cell cycle (B-IGSOFC), and a steam-Rankine cycle. The simulated design-point efficiency of the B-IGSOFC is the highest among all systems (51.8%, LHV basis), with modestly lower efficiencies for the B-IGCC design using a pressurized, oxygen-blown gasifier (49.5% LHV) and for the B-IGCC design using a low-pressure indirectly heated gasifier (48.6%, LHV). The steam-Rankine system has a simulated efficiency of 33.0% (LHV). Detailed capital costs are estimated assuming commercially mature ('N-th plant') technologies for the two B-IGCC and the steam-Rankine systems. B-IGCC systems are more capital-intensive than the steam-Rankine system, but discounted cash flow rate of return calculations highlight the total cost advantage of the B-IGCC systems when biomass prices are higher. Uncertainties regarding prospective mature-technology costs for solid oxide fuel cells and hot gas sulfur clean-up technologies assumed for the B-IGSOFC performance analysis make it difficult to evaluate the prospective electricity generating costs for B-IGSOFC relative to B-IGCC. The rough analysis here suggests that B-IGSOFC will not show improved economics relative to B-IGCC at the large scale considered here. (C) 2009 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
引用
收藏
页码:142 / 173
页数:32
相关论文
共 60 条
[31]  
MARRISON CI, 1995, 2 BIOM C AM NAT REN, P1272
[32]  
McLaughlin S., 1999, PERSPECTIVES NEW CRO, P282, DOI DOI 10.1081/E-EPCS
[33]  
*MTCI, 1990, TEST ADV THERM CONV
[34]  
NEWBY RA, 2002, P 5 INT S GAS CLEAN
[35]  
NEWBY RA, 1998, OPTIMIZATION ADV FIL
[36]   The role of kaolin in prevention of bed agglomeration during fluidized bed combustion of biomass fuels [J].
Öhman, M ;
Nordin, A .
ENERGY & FUELS, 2000, 14 (03) :618-624
[37]  
*OPPA, 1990, DOEPE0097P OPPA
[38]   Biomass gasification for gas turbine-based power generation [J].
Paisley, MA ;
Anson, D .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 1998, 120 (02) :284-288
[39]  
PAISLEY MA, 2002, P PITTSB COAL C
[40]   Removal of tar by secondary air in fluidised bed gasification of residual biomass and coal [J].
Pan, YG ;
Roca, X ;
Velo, E ;
Puigjaner, L .
FUEL, 1999, 78 (14) :1703-1709