Pre-eclampsia rates in the United States, 1980-2010: age-period-cohort analysis

被引:636
作者
Ananth, Cande V. [1 ,2 ]
Keyes, Katherine M. [2 ]
Wapner, Ronald J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Coll Phys & Surg, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, New York, NY 10032 USA
[2] Columbia Univ, Joseph L Mailman Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, New York, NY 10032 USA
来源
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL | 2013年 / 347卷
关键词
FETAL-GROWTH RESTRICTION; SECULAR TRENDS; RISK; SMOKING; EPIDEMIOLOGY; HYPERTENSION; PREGNANCY; PREVALENCE; OBESITY; BIRTH;
D O I
10.1136/bmj.f6564
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective To estimate the contributions of biological aging, historical trends, and birth cohort effects on trends in pre-eclampsia in the United States. Design Population based retrospective study. Setting National hospital discharge survey datasets, 1980-2010, United States. Participants 120 million women admitted to hospital for delivery. Main outcome measures Temporal changes in rates of mild and severe pre-eclampsia in relation to maternal age, year of delivery, and birth cohorts. Poisson regression as well as multilevel age-period-cohort models with adjustment for obesity and smoking were incorporated. Results The rate of pre-eclampsia was 3.4%. The age-period-cohort analysis showed a strong age effect, with women at the extremes of maternal age having the greatest risk of pre-eclampsia. In comparison with women delivering in 1980, those delivering in 2003 were at 6.7-fold (95% confidence interval 5.6-fold to 8.0-fold) increased risk of severe pre-eclampsia. Period effects declined after 2003. Trends for severe pre-eclampsia also showed a modest birth cohort effect, with women born in the 1970s at increased risk. Compared with women born in 1955, the risk ratio for women born in 1970 was 1.2 (95% confidence interval 1.1 to 1.3). Similar patterns were also evident for mild pre-eclampsia, although attenuated. Changes in the population prevalence of obesity and smoking were associated with period and cohort trends in pre-eclampsia but did not explain the trends. Conclusions Rates of severe pre-eclampsia have been increasing in the United States and age-period-cohort effects all contribute to these trends. Although smoking and obesity have driven these trends, changes in the diagnostic criteria may have also contributed to the age-period-cohort effects. Health consequences of rising obesity rates in the United States underscore that efforts to reduce obesity may be beneficial to maternal and perinatal health.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [41] Birth cohort effects among US-born adults born in the 1980s: foreshadowing future trends in US obesity prevalence
    Robinson, W. R.
    Keyes, K. M.
    Utz, R. L.
    Martin, C. L.
    Yang, Y.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBESITY, 2013, 37 (03) : 448 - 454
  • [42] Intergenerational factors - A missing link for preeclampsia, fetal growth restriction, and cardiovascular disease?
    Sibai, Baha M.
    [J]. HYPERTENSION, 2008, 51 (04) : 993 - 994
  • [43] The interval between pregnancies and the risk of preeclampsia
    Skjærven, R
    Wilcox, AJ
    Lie, RT
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2002, 346 (01) : 33 - 38
  • [44] Secular trends in the rates of preeclampsia, eclampsia, and gestational hypertension, United States, 1987-2004
    Wallis, Anne B.
    Saftlas, Audrey F.
    Hsia, Jason
    Atrash, Hani K.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2008, 21 (05) : 521 - 526
  • [45] Yang Y, 2007, ENCY HLTH AGING
  • [46] Yang Y, 2013, AGE PERIOD COHORT AN
  • [47] Accuracy of obstetric diagnoses and procedures in hospital discharge data
    Yasmeen, S
    Romano, PS
    Schembri, ME
    Keyzer, JM
    Gilbert, WM
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 194 (04) : 992 - 1001
  • [48] Epidemiology of pregnancy-induced hypertension
    Zhang, J
    Zeisler, J
    Hatch, MC
    Berkowitz, G
    [J]. EPIDEMIOLOGIC REVIEWS, 1997, 19 (02) : 218 - 232
  • [49] Risks of hypertensive disorders in the second pregnancy
    Zhang, J
    Troendle, JF
    Levine, RJ
    [J]. PAEDIATRIC AND PERINATAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2001, 15 (03) : 226 - 231