Predicting prostate cancer risk through incorporation of prostate cancer gene 3

被引:87
作者
Ankerst, Donna Pauler [1 ,2 ]
Groskopf, Jack [4 ]
Day, John R. [4 ]
Blase, Amy [4 ]
Rittenhouse, Harry [4 ]
Pollock, Brad H. [2 ]
Tangen, Cathy [5 ]
Parekh, Dipen [1 ]
Leach, Robin J. [1 ,3 ]
Thompson, Ian [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr San Antonio, Dept Urol, San Antonio, TX 78229 USA
[2] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr San Antonio, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, San Antonio, TX 78229 USA
[3] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr San Antonio, Dept Cell & Struct Biol, San Antonio, TX 78229 USA
[4] Gen Probe Inc, San Diego, CA USA
[5] Fred Hutchinson Canc Res Ctr, Div Publ Hlth Sci, Seattle, WA 98104 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
prostate cancer antigen 3; human; likelihood functions; biological markers; prostatic neoplasms; risk assessment;
D O I
10.1016/j.juro.2008.06.038
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: The online Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial risk calculator combines prostate specific antigen, digital rectal examination, family and biopsy history, age and race to determine the risk of prostate cancer. In this report we incorporate the biomarker prostate cancer gene 3 into the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial risk calculator. Materials and Methods: Methodology was developed to incorporate new markers for prostate cancer into the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial risk calculator based on likelihood ratios calculated from separate case control or cohort studies. The methodology was applied to incorporate the marker prostate cancer gene 3 into the risk calculator based on a cohort of 521 men who underwent prostate biopsy with measurements of urinary prostate cancer gene 3, serum prostate specific antigen, digital rectal examination and biopsy history. External validation of the updated risk calculator was performed on a cohort of 443 European patients, and compared to Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial risks, prostate specific antigen and prostate cancer gene 3 by area underneath the receiver operating characteristic curve, sensitivity and specificity. Results: The AUC of posterior risks (AUC 0.696, 95% CI 0.641-0.750) was higher than that of prostate specific antigen (AUC 0.607, 95% CI 0.546-0.668, p = 0.001) and Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial risks (AUC 0.653, 95% CI 0.593-0.714, p <0.05). Although it was higher it was not statistically significantly different from that of prostate cancer gene 3 (AUC 0.665, 95% CI 0.610-0.721, p >0.05). Sensitivities of posterior risks were higher than those of prostate cancer gene 3, prostate specific antigen and Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial risks. Conclusions: New markers for prostate cancer can be incorporated into the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial risk calculator by a novel approach. Incorporation.
引用
收藏
页码:1303 / 1308
页数:6
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] Prospective breast cancer risk prediction model for women undergoing screening mammography
    Barlow, William E.
    White, Emily
    Ballard-Barbash, Rachel
    Vacek, Pamela M.
    Titus-Ernstoff, Linda
    Carney, Patricia A.
    Tice, Jeffrey A.
    Buist, Diana S. M.
    Geller, Berta M.
    Rosenberg, Robert
    Yankaskas, Bonnie C.
    Kerlikowske, Karla
    [J]. JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2006, 98 (17): : 1204 - 1214
  • [2] Development and external validation of an extended repeat biopsy nomogram
    Chun, Felix K. -H.
    Briganti, Alberto
    Graefen, Markus
    Porter, Christopher
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Haese, Alexander
    Scattoni, Vincenzo
    Borden, Lester
    Steuber, Thomas
    Salonia, Andrea
    Schlomm, Thorsten
    Latchemsetty, Kalyan
    Walz, Jochen
    Kim, Jason
    Eichelberg, Christian
    Currlin, Eike
    Ahyai, Sascha A.
    Erbersdobler, Andreas
    Valiquette, Luc
    Heinzer, Hans
    Rigatti, Patrizio
    Huland, Hartwig
    Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 177 (02) : 510 - 515
  • [3] de Kok JB, 2002, CANCER RES, V62, P2695
  • [4] COMPARING THE AREAS UNDER 2 OR MORE CORRELATED RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVES - A NONPARAMETRIC APPROACH
    DELONG, ER
    DELONG, DM
    CLARKEPEARSON, DI
    [J]. BIOMETRICS, 1988, 44 (03) : 837 - 845
  • [5] PCA3: A molecular urine assay for predicting prostate biopsy outcome
    Deras, Ina L.
    Aubin, Sheila M. J.
    Blase, Amy
    Day, John R.
    Koo, Seongjoon
    Partin, Alan W.
    Ellis, William J.
    Marks, Leonard S.
    Fradet, Yves
    Rittenhouse, Harry
    Groskopf, Jack
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2008, 179 (04) : 1587 - 1592
  • [6] Algorithms based on prostate-specific antigen (PSA), free psa, digital rectal examination and prostate volume reduce false-postitive psa results in prostate cancer screening
    Finne, P
    Finne, R
    Bangma, C
    Hugosson, J
    Hakama, M
    Auvinen, A
    Stenman, UH
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2004, 111 (02) : 310 - 315
  • [7] Comparison between the prostate cancer risk calculator and serum PSA
    Han, Misop
    Humphreys, Elizabeth B.
    Hernandez, David J.
    Partin, Alan W.
    Roehl, Kimberly A.
    Catalona, William J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 177 (04) : 622 - 623
  • [8] External validation of the prostate cancer risk calculator
    Hernandez, David J.
    Han, Misop
    Humphreys, Elizabeth B.
    Mangold, Leslie A.
    Brawer, Michael K.
    Taneja, Samir S.
    Childs, Stacy J.
    Stamey, Thomas A.
    Partin, Alan W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 177 (04) : 622 - 622
  • [9] PCA3 molecular urine assay for prostate cancer in men undergoing repeat biopsy
    Marks, Leonard S.
    Fradet, Yves
    Deras, Ina Lim
    Blase, Amy
    Mathis, Jeannette
    Aubin, Sheila M. J.
    Cancio, Anthony T.
    Desaulniers, Marie
    Ellis, William J.
    Rittenhouse, Harry
    Groskopf, Jack
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2007, 69 (03) : 532 - 535
  • [10] External validation of the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial risk calculator in a screened population
    Parekh, Dipen J.
    Ankerst, Donna Pauler
    Higgins, Betsy A.
    Hernandez, Javier
    Canby-Hagino, Edith.
    Brand, Timothy
    Troyer, Dean A.
    Leach, Robin J.
    Thompson, Ian M.
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2006, 68 (06) : 1152 - 1155