Governing metropolitan green infrastructure in the United States

被引:103
作者
Young, Robert F. [1 ]
McPherson, E. Gregory [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Austin, Sch Architecture, Community & Reg Planning Program, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[2] US Forest Serv, USDA, Pacific SW Res Stn, Davis, CA USA
关键词
Ecosystem services; Green infrastructure; Governance; Institutionalization; Sustainability; Urban forestry; ENVIRONMENTAL GOVERNANCE; POLICY; BELTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.09.004
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
In this paper we explore whether the enhancement of urban ecosystem services through large-scale, metropolitan tree-planting initiatives is being planned and executed as a component of traditional municipal government or represents new, transdisciplinary strategies in environmental governance. Drawing on qualitative interviews with stakeholders in six major cities (n = 58) we further explore institutionalization of these initiatives and relationships. While much current discourse posits government cannot "go it alone" in providing preventative, "front-end" solutions to complex environmental problems, we found the public sector dominant in the visioning, planning, and management of these green infrastructure initiatives and the role of the private sector to be minimal. We also found that, despite this dominance, the initiatives had limited success in becoming institutionalized. This dichotomy reflects that while discourses labeling the public sector unable to grapple with complex environmental issues and the private sector dominant in environmental governance regimes are premature, institutionalizing the solutions into the machinery of government remains a contested arena. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:67 / 75
页数:9
相关论文
共 59 条
[41]   Scrutinizing the link between participatory governance and urban environment management. The experience in Arequipa during 2003-2006 [J].
Peris, Jordi ;
Acebillo-Baque, Miriam ;
Calabuig, Carola .
HABITAT INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 35 (01) :84-92
[42]   Urban ecological footprints: Why cities cannot be sustainable - And why they are a key to sustainability [J].
Rees, W ;
Wackernagel, M .
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 1996, 16 (4-6) :223-248
[43]   Redefining innovation - eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics [J].
Rennings, K .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2000, 32 (02) :319-332
[44]   Learning to adapt to climate change in urban areas. A review of recent contributions [J].
Sanchez-Rodriguez, Roberto .
CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2009, 1 (02) :201-206
[45]   The Democratization of Planning: Elusive or Illusory? [J].
Sandercock, Leonie .
PLANNING THEORY & PRACTICE, 2005, 6 (04) :437-441
[46]   Greening the Rust Belt A Green Infrastructure Model for Right Sizing America's Shrinking Cities [J].
Schilling, Joseph ;
Logan, Jonathan .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION, 2008, 74 (04) :451-466
[47]  
Sellers JeffereyM., 2002, GOVERNING URBAN REGI
[48]   The New Geography of Contemporary Urbanization and the Environment [J].
Seto, Karen C. ;
Sanchez-Rodriguez, Roberto ;
Fragkias, Michail .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENT AND RESOURCES, VOL 35, 2010, 35 :167-194
[49]   Mainstreaming climate change adaptation in Indian cities [J].
Sharma, Divya ;
Tomar, Sanjay .
ENVIRONMENT AND URBANIZATION, 2010, 22 (02) :451-465
[50]  
Sisinni S., 2000, PNWGR490 USDA FOR SE