CORRELATIONS BETWEEN AESTHETIC PREFERENCES OF RIVER AND LANDSCAPE CHARACTERS

被引：62

作者：

Zhao, Jingwei ^{[1
,2
]}

Luo, Pingjia ^{[2
]}

Wang, Ronghua ^{[3
]}

Cai, Yongli ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] E China Normal Univ, Sch Resources & Environm, Shanghai 200062, Peoples R China

[2] China Univ Min & Technol, Sch Art & Design, Xuzhou, Peoples R China

[3] Xuzhou Normal Univ, Sch Urban & Environm Sci, Xuzhou, Peoples R China

来源：

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING AND LANDSCAPE MANAGEMENT | 2013年 / 21卷 / 02期

关键词：

river; aesthetic preferences; landscape characters; landscape management; QUALITY ASSESSMENT; VISUAL QUALITY; SCENIC BEAUTY; ASSOCIATIONS; ATTRIBUTES; VALIDITY; WATER;

D O I：

10.3846/16486897.2012.695738

中图分类号：

X [环境科学、安全科学];

学科分类号：

08 ; 0830 ;

摘要：

Some landscape characters put great influences on the aesthetic preferences of a river. Finding out these characters will provide for river landscape design and management with explicit keystones. In this paper, 23 sample areas of rivers were selected in Xuzhou, China, and 15 landscape characters of rivers were identified. The photos taken at the sample areas were as stimuli, and undergraduate students were respondents. The results demonstrate that the aesthetic preferences of photos judged one-by-one and judged together receive similar results; the preference scores of deflective views are significantly higher than the ones of opposite views; for urban rivers, "river accessibility" and "number of colours" are reliably positive predictors to aesthetic preferences, "wood diversity index" and "plants on water" are negative ones; for rural rivers, "coverage of riparian vegetation", "perspective" and "wood diversity index" are reliably positive predictors to aesthetic preferences.

引用

页码：123 / 132

页数：10

共 30 条

[1]

Andrea G., 2009, ECOL ENG, V35, P92

[2] Assessing the visual quality of rural landscapes [J].

Arriaza, M ;

Cañas-Ortega, JF ;

Cañas-Madueño, JA ;

Ruiz-Aviles, P .

LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2004, 69 (01) :115-125

[3] Assessing public preferences for design and environmental attributes of an urban automated transportation system [J].

Bernasconi, Claudia ;

Strager, Michael R. ;

Maskey, Vishakha ;

Hasenmyer, Michael .

LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2009, 90 (3-4) :155-167

[4] Determination of landscape beauties through visual quality assessment method: a case study for Kemaliye (Erzincan/Turkey) [J].

Bulut, Zohre ;

Yilmaz, Hasan .

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2008, 141 (1-3) :121-129

[5] A contribution to the assessment of scenic quality of landscapes based on preferences expressed by the public [J].

Canas, I. ;

Ayuga, E. ;

Ayuga, F. .

LAND USE POLICY, 2009, 26 (04) :1173-1181

[6] Whither scenic beauty? Visual landscape quality assessment in the 21st century [J].

Daniel, TC .

LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2001, 54 (1-4) :267-281

[7] Visions of nature and landscape type preferences: an exploration in The Netherlands [J].

de Groot, WT ;

van den Born, RJG .

LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2003, 63 (03) :127-138

[8] Analysis of the materials and exterior texture of agro-industrial buildings:: a photo-analytical approach to landscape integration [J].

García, L ;

Hernández, J ;

Ayuga, F .

LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2006, 74 (02) :110-124

[9] AN ECOSYSTEM PERSPECTIVE OF RIPARIAN ZONES [J].

GREGORY, SV ;

SWANSON, FJ ;

MCKEE, WA ;

CUMMINS, KW .

BIOSCIENCE, 1991, 41 (08) :540-551

[10] Fractal dimension of landscape silhouette outlines as a predictor of landscape preference [J].

Hagerhall, CM ;

Purcell, T ;

Taylor, R .

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 24 (02) :247-255

← 1 2 3 →