Visions of nature and landscape type preferences: an exploration in The Netherlands

被引:114
作者
de Groot, WT
van den Born, RJG
机构
[1] Univ Nijmegen, NL-6500 HE Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Leiden Univ, Ctr Environm Sci, NL-6500 HE Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
landscape; nature; the Netherlands; attitudes; naturalness; relationship with nature; wilderness; deep ecology; NEP;
D O I
10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00184-6
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
A survey was carried out among inhabitants of Gennep, a small-town municipality in the east of The Netherlands, questioning about (1) the types of nature that people distinguish and the levels of naturalness ascribed to these types of nature; (2) the images that people hold of the appropriate relationship between people and nature and the level of adherence to these images, and (3) people's preference of broadly defined landscape types. Types of nature inferred by means of factor analysis were labeled arcadian, wild and penetrative nature, the last category comprising elements such as mosquitoes and rats in the barn. Factor analysis was used as well to infer images of appropriate relationship, which appeared to hinge around the concepts of mastery over nature, responsibility for nature and participation in nature, respectively. Levels of adherence to the responsibility and participation images were very high, indicative of a 'new biophilia' mainstream in Dutch culture. Landscape types were defined, roughly, as (1) landscape made by and for people; (2) park-like, arcadian landscape; (3) wild, interactive landscape and (4) landscape "in which one may experience the greatness and forces of nature". Strikingly, more than half of the respondents expressed preference for this last ('deep ecology') landscape type, with another third preferring the wild, interactive landscape. The highest preference of the 'greatness and forces' landscape was found among the respondents with high ascription of naturalness to the penetrative type of nature and respondents adhering to the participation-in-nature image of relationship. Preferences for landscape types as defined here should be distinguished from visual or behavioral landscape preferences. Even if people may not select landscapes of the 'greatness and forces of nature' in daily behaviors, these landscapes of wilderness and greatness do connect with human visions and desires. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:127 / 138
页数:12
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]   NEW ENVIRONMENTAL PARADIGM [J].
DUNLAP, RE ;
VANLIERE, KD .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION, 1978, 9 (04) :10-19
[2]   Beyond toxicity - Human health and the natural environment [J].
Frumkin, P .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2001, 20 (03) :234-240
[3]   Greener still? An empirical examination of Eckersley's ecocentric approach [J].
Grendstad, G ;
Wollebaek, D .
ENVIRONMENT AND BEHAVIOR, 1998, 30 (05) :653-675
[4]   Cultural and developmental comparisons of landscape perceptions and preferences [J].
Herzog, TR ;
Herbert, EJ ;
Kaplan, R ;
Crooks, CL .
ENVIRONMENT AND BEHAVIOR, 2000, 32 (03) :323-346
[5]   Values about nature in organic farming practice and knowledge [J].
Kaltoft, P .
SOCIOLOGIA RURALIS, 1999, 39 (01) :39-+
[6]   Rating scale measures of restorative components of environments [J].
Laumann, K ;
Gärling, T ;
Stormark, KM .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 21 (01) :31-44
[7]   Visual preference of the public for vegetation groups in Israel [J].
Misgav, A .
LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2000, 48 (3-4) :143-159
[8]   Patterns of reasoning exhibited by children and adolescents in response to moral dilemmas involving plants, animals and ecosystems [J].
Nevers, P ;
Gebhard, U ;
BillmannMahecha, E .
JOURNAL OF MORAL EDUCATION, 1997, 26 (02) :169-186
[9]   Preference and naturalness: An ecological approach [J].
Purcell, AT ;
Lamb, RJ .
LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 1998, 42 (01) :57-66
[10]   HUMAN RESPONSES TO VEGETATION AND LANDSCAPES [J].
ULRICH, RS .
LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 1986, 13 (01) :29-44