Building public confidence in energy planning: a multimethod MCDM approach to demand-side planning at BC gas

被引:96
作者
Hobbs, BF [1 ]
Horn, GTF [1 ]
机构
[1] PLANIT MANAGEMENT,VANCOUVER,BC V6K 1X4,CANADA
关键词
electricity utility planning; decision analysis; public participation;
D O I
10.1016/S0301-4215(97)00025-6
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) methods are one means of quantifying stakeholder values, but the way such methods are usually applied can cause people to feel manipulated by a 'black-box' methodology. An approach is proposed to mitigate this problem, It asks each person to apply two or more methods and to then resolve disagreements in the results in order to build understanding. The approach recognizes that no single method is best for every person. We describe a successful application by a diverse stakeholder group. The results confirm that decisions yielded by alternative MCDM methods can disagree and that a multimethod approach builds insight and confidence. (C) 1997 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:357 / 375
页数:19
相关论文
共 47 条
[11]   HOW TO USE MULTIATTRIBUTE UTILITY MEASUREMENT FOR SOCIAL DECISIONMAKING [J].
EDWARDS, W .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS, 1977, 7 (05) :326-340
[12]   RANGE SENSITIVITY OF ATTRIBUTE WEIGHT IN MULTIATTRIBUTE VALUE MODELS [J].
FISCHER, GW .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1995, 62 (03) :252-266
[13]  
FISCHOFF B, 1979, COGNITIVE PROCESSES
[14]   CREATING POLICY ALTERNATIVES USING STAKEHOLDER VALUES [J].
GREGORY, R ;
KEENEY, RL .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1994, 40 (08) :1035-1048
[15]   VALUING ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES - A CONSTRUCTIVE APPROACH [J].
GREGORY, R ;
LICHTENSTEIN, S ;
SLOVIC, P .
JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY, 1993, 7 (02) :177-197
[16]   COMPARATIVE STUDY OF DIFFERENCES IN SUBJECTIVE LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATES MADE BY INDIVIDUALS, INTERACTING GROUPS, DELPHI GROUPS, AND NOMINAL GROUPS [J].
GUSTAFSON, DH ;
SHUKLA, RK ;
DELBECQ, A ;
WALSTER, GW .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN PERFORMANCE, 1973, 9 (02) :280-291
[17]   A DECISION AID IN THE PUBLIC DEBATE ON NUCLEAR-POWER [J].
HAMALAINEN, RP .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1990, 48 (01) :66-76
[18]   A COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT METHODS FOR THE ELICITATION OF ATTRIBUTE WEIGHTS - STRUCTURAL MODELING, PROCESS TRACING, AND SELF-REPORTS [J].
HARTE, JM ;
KOELE, P .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1995, 64 (01) :49-64
[19]   DOES CHOICE OF MULTICRITERIA METHOD MATTER - AN EXPERIMENT IN WATER-RESOURCES PLANNING [J].
HOBBS, BF ;
CHANKONG, V ;
HAMADEH, W ;
STAKHIV, EZ .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1992, 28 (07) :1767-1779
[20]   WHAT CAN WE LEARN FROM EXPERIMENTS IN MULTIOBJECTIVE DECISION-ANALYSIS [J].
HOBBS, BF .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS, 1986, 16 (03) :384-394