Effect of manufacturing system constructs on pick-up and drop-off strategies of multiple-load AGVs

被引:16
作者
Lee, J [1 ]
Srisawat, T [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Louisiana Lafayette, Engn Management Program, Lafayette, LA 70504 USA
关键词
automated guided vehicle system; system construct; composite dispatching heuristics; simulation models; material handling system; statistical analyses;
D O I
10.1080/00207540500251646
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
This research investigates the interaction between manufacturing system constructs and the operation strategies in a multiple- load Automated Guided Vehicle System (AGVS) when AGVs in a system can carry two or more loads. The load pick-up problem arises when an AGV stops at a pick-up queue and has to decide which part(s) in the queue should be picked up. Since an AGV can carry multiple loads, a drop-off rule is then needed to determine the next stop for the AGV to deliver one or more loads. Several real-time composite heuristic rules for selecting load and determining the next stop are proposed and evaluated in two manufacturing system constructs: the jobshop and the flexible manufacturing system (FMS). A number of simulation models are developed to obtain statistics on various performance measures of the two system constructs under different experimental conditions. The simulation results reveal that the pick-up rules affect the system more than the drop-off rules. In general, rules to avoid starving and blocking in workstations perform better than the rules for shortest distance in throughput. However, the rules perform differently in jobshop and FMS based on other performance measures, indicating an interaction between system constructs and load selection strategies. The difference in rule performance within the same construct is also affected by several AGVS design parameters. Overall our study suggests that no load pick-up rule is always a champion, and the design of an efficient multiple- load AGVS must consider all issues in a global fashion.
引用
收藏
页码:653 / 673
页数:21
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
Abdelmaguid TF, 2004, INT J PROD RES, V42, P267, DOI [10.1080/0020754032000123579, 10.1080/0020754031000123579]
[2]   AGV systems with multi-load carriers: Basic issues and potential benefits [J].
Bilge, U ;
Tanchoco, JMA .
JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS, 1997, 16 (03) :159-174
[3]  
DOTOLI R, 2004, INT J PROD RES, V42, P4239
[4]   PULL VERSUS PUSH STRATEGY FOR AUTOMATED GUIDED VEHICLE LOAD MOVEMENT IN A BATCH MANUFACTURING SYSTEM [J].
EGBELU, PJ .
JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS, 1987, 6 (03) :209-221
[5]   Analysis of automated guided vehicle configurations in flexible manufacturing systems [J].
Farling, BE ;
Mosier, CT ;
Mahmoodi, F .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2001, 39 (18) :4239-4260
[6]   A machine-to-loop assignment and layout design methodology for tandem AGV systems with multiple-load vehicles [J].
Ho, YC ;
Hsieh, PF .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2004, 42 (04) :801-832
[7]  
Hoff E. B., 1998, Integrated Manufacturing Systems, V9, P296, DOI 10.1108/09576069810230400
[8]   A multi-attribute dispatching rule for automated guided vehicle systems [J].
Jeong, BH ;
Randhawa, SU .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2001, 39 (13) :2817-2832
[9]  
Kelton W.D., 2004, SIMULATION ARENA, V4th
[10]   Load selection of automated guided vehicles in flexible manufacturing systems [J].
Lee, J ;
Tangjarukij, M ;
Zhu, Z .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 1996, 34 (12) :3383-3400