New model for analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI data distinguishes metastatic from nonmetastatic transplanted rodent prostate tumors

被引:79
作者
Fan, XB
Medved, M
River, JN
Zamora, M
Corot, C
Robert, P
Bourrinet, P
Lipton, M
Culp, RM
Karczmar, GS
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, Dept Radiol, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[2] Guerbet Labs, F-95943 Roissy CDG, France
关键词
dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI; prostate cancer; P792; Gd-DTPA; angiogenesis;
D O I
10.1002/mrm.10737
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCEMRI) data were acquired from metastatic and nonmetastatic tumors in rodents to follow the uptake and washout of a low-molecular-weight contrast agent (Gd-DTPA) and a contrast agent with higher molecular weight (P792). The concentration vs. time curves calculated for the tumor rims and centers were analyzed using the two-compartment model (TCM) and a newly developed empirical mathematical model (EMM). The EMM provided improved fits to the experimental data compared to the TCM. Parameters derived from the empirical model showed that the contrast agent washout rate was significantly slower in metastatic tumors than in nonmetastatic tumors for both Gd-DTPA (P < 0.03) and P792 (P < 0.04). The effects of the tumor on blood flow in "normal" tissue immediately adjacent to the tumors were evident: GdDTPA uptake and washout rates were much lower in muscle near the tumor (P < 0.05) than normal muscle farther from the tumor. The results suggest that accurate fits of DCEMRI data provide kinetic parameters that distinguish between metastatic and relatively benign cancers. In addition, a comparison of the dynamics of Gd-DTPA and P792 provides information regarding the microenvironment of tumors. (C) 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:487 / 494
页数:8
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
BYDDER GM, 1999, MAGNETIC RESONANCE I, V1, P69
[2]  
Corot C, 2000, J MAGN RESON IMAGING, V11, P182, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2586(200002)11:2<182::AID-JMRI16>3.0.CO
[3]  
2-5
[4]   Breast disease: Dynamic spiral MR imaging [J].
Daniel, BL ;
Yen, YF ;
Glover, GH ;
Ikeda, DM ;
Birdwell, RL ;
Sawyer-Glover, AM ;
Black, JW ;
Plevritis, SK ;
Jeffrey, SS ;
Herfkens, RJ .
RADIOLOGY, 1998, 209 (02) :499-509
[5]   A MRI spatial mapping technique for microvascular permeability and tissue blood volume based on macromolecular contrast agent distribution [J].
Demsar, F ;
Roberts, TPL ;
Schwickert, HC ;
Shames, DM ;
vanDijke, CF ;
Mann, JS ;
Saeed, M ;
Brasch, RC .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1997, 37 (02) :236-242
[6]   Differentiation of nonmetastatic and metastatic rodent prostate tumors with high spectral and spatial resolution MRI [J].
Fan, XB ;
River, JN ;
Zamora, M ;
Tarlo, K ;
Kellar, K ;
Rinker-Schaeffer, C ;
Karczmar, GS .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2001, 45 (06) :1046-1055
[7]   Dynamic echo-planar imaging of the breast: Experience in diagnosing breast carcinoma and correlation with tumor angiogenesis [J].
Hulka, CA ;
Edmister, WB ;
Smith, BL ;
Tan, LJ ;
Sgroi, DC ;
Campbell, T ;
Kopans, DB ;
Weisskoff, RM .
RADIOLOGY, 1997, 205 (03) :837-842
[8]  
KETY SS, 1951, PHARMACOL REV, V3, P1
[9]   A new method for imaging perfusion and contrast extraction fraction: Input functions derived from reference tissues [J].
Kovar, DA ;
Lewis, M ;
Karczmar, GS .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 1998, 8 (05) :1126-1134
[10]   Dynamic breast MR imaging: Are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions? [J].
Kuhl, CK ;
Mielcareck, P ;
Klaschik, S ;
Leutner, C ;
Wardelmann, E ;
Gieseke, J ;
Schild, HH .
RADIOLOGY, 1999, 211 (01) :101-110