Key factors affecting long-term penetration of global onshore wind energy integrating top-down and bottom-up approaches

被引:38
作者
Dai, Hancheng [1 ]
Herran, Diego Silva [1 ]
Fujimori, Shinichiro [1 ]
Masui, Toshihiko [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Environm Studies, Ctr Social & Environm Syst Res, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 3058506, Japan
关键词
Global onshore wind penetration; Influencing factors; Computable general equilibrium (CGE) model; Wind resource potential; RENEWABLE ENERGY; TECHNOLOGIES; REDUCTION; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.renene.2015.05.060
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
We quantified key factors affecting the penetration of global onshore wind energy by 2050. We analyzed a large set of scenarios by combining a wind resource model and a computable general equilibrium (CGE) model. Five factors, including onshore wind resource potential, investment cost, balancing cost, transmission cost and climate change mitigation policy, were considered to generate 96 scenarios and regression analysis was used to assess relevance among the factors. We found that the strongest factors were resource potential and climate target, followed by wind power technology investment cost. Other factors, such as balancing and transmission costs, had relatively smaller impacts. World total onshore wind power in 2050 increases by 13.2 and 15.5 (41% and 49% of 2005 total power generation, respectively) EJ/year if wind potential rises from low to medium and high levels, respectively. Furthermore, 5.9, 17.8, and 24.3 EJ/year of additional wind power could be generated under climate targets of 650, 550 and 450 ppm CO2-eq, respectively. Moreover, reducing wind power technology investment cost would increase global wind power by another 9.2 EJ/year. The methodology can be extended to assess other mitigation technologies if the related data is available. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:19 / 30
页数:12
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   GHG emission scenarios in Asia and the world: The key technologies for significant reduction [J].
Akashi, Osamu ;
Hijioka, Yasuaki ;
Masui, Toshihiko ;
Hanaoka, Tatsuya ;
Kainuma, Mikiko .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2012, 34 :S346-S358
[2]   Technological feasibility and costs of achieving a 50 % reduction of global GHG emissions by 2050: mid- and long-term perspectives [J].
Akashi, Osamu ;
Hanaoka, Tatsuya .
SUSTAINABILITY SCIENCE, 2012, 7 (02) :139-156
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2013, TECHNOLOGY ROADMAP W
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2013, VEST 2 MW PLATF CAT
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2013, CONTRIBUTION WORKING, DOI 10.1017/CBO9781107415324
[6]   MODELING ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES IN A COMPETITIVE MARKET [J].
CLARKE, JF ;
EDMONDS, JA .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 1993, 15 (02) :123-129
[7]   Renewable energy sources: Their global potential for the first-half of the 21st century at a global level: An integrated approach [J].
de Vries, Bert J. M. ;
van Vuuren, Detlef P. ;
Hoogwijk, Monique M. .
ENERGY POLICY, 2007, 35 (04) :2590-2610
[8]  
Edenhofer O, 2011, RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES AND CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION: SPECIAL REPORT OF THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE, P1
[9]   The effectiveness of energy service demand reduction: A scenario analysis of global climate change mitigation [J].
Fujimori, S. ;
Kainuma, M. ;
Masui, T. ;
Hasegawa, T. ;
Dai, H. .
ENERGY POLICY, 2014, 75 :379-391
[10]  
Fujimori S., 2012, AIM/CGE basic Manual