The problem of the accuracy of intraoperative examination of axillary sentinel nodes in breast cancer

被引:33
作者
Zurrida, S
Mazzarol, G
Galimberti, V
Renne, G
Bassi, F
Iafrate, F
Viale, G
机构
[1] Univ Milan, Sch Med, European Inst Oncol, Dept Senol,Sci Directors Off, I-20141 Milan, Italy
[2] Univ Milan, Sch Med, European Inst Oncol, Dept Pathol & Lab Med, I-20141 Milan, Italy
关键词
D O I
10.1007/s10434-001-0817-7
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Sentinel node (SN) biopsy has become accepted as a reliable method of predicting the state of the axilla in breast cancer. The key issue, however, is the accuracy of the pathological evaluation of the biopsied node, which should be done intraoperatively whenever possible. Methods: In our initial experience on 192 patients using a conventional intraoperative frozen section method, the false-negative rate was 6.3%, and the negative predictive value was 93.7%. We devised a new and exhaustive intraoperative method, requiring about 40 minutes, in which pairs of sections are taken every 50 mum for the first 15 sections and every 100 mum thereafter, sampling the entire node. Sentinel node metastases were found in 143 of the 376 T1N0 cases examined (38%). Results: Metastases were always identified on hematoxylin and eosin sections, although in 4% of cases, cytokeratin immunostaining on adjacent sections was useful for confirming malignancy. In 233 patients the SNs were disease-free; of these patients, 222 had metastasis-free axillary nodes, and 11 (4.7%) had another metastatic node. Conclusion: Extensive intraoperative examination of frozen sentinel nodes correctly predicts an uninvolved axilla in 95.3% of cases (negative predictive value). This method is, therefore, suitable for identifying patients in whom axillary dissection can be avoided.
引用
收藏
页码:817 / 820
页数:4
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy in the patient with breast cancer [J].
Albertini, JJ ;
Lyman, GH ;
Cox, C ;
Yeatman, T ;
Balducci, L ;
Ku, NN ;
Shivers, S ;
Berman, C ;
Wells, K ;
Rapaport, D ;
Shons, A ;
Horton, J ;
Greenberg, H ;
Nicosia, S ;
Clark, R ;
Cantor, A ;
Reintgen, DS .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1996, 276 (22) :1818-1822
[2]   Sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer: Guidelines and pitfalls of lymphoscintigraphy and gamma probe detection [J].
Borgstein, P ;
Pijpers, R ;
Comans, EF ;
van Diest, PJ ;
Boom, RP ;
Meijer, S .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 1998, 186 (03) :275-283
[3]   A RAPID IMMUNOSTAINING METHOD FOR FROZEN-SECTIONS [J].
CHILOSI, M ;
LESTANI, M ;
PEDRON, S ;
MONTAGNA, L ;
BENEDETTI, A ;
PIZZOLO, G ;
MENESTRINA, F .
BIOTECHNIC & HISTOCHEMISTRY, 1994, 69 (04) :235-239
[4]   Guidelines for sentinel node biopsy and lymphatic mapping of patients with breast cancer [J].
Cox, CE ;
Pendas, S ;
Cox, JM ;
Joseph, E ;
Shons, AR ;
Yeatman, T ;
Ku, NN ;
Lyman, GH ;
Berman, C ;
Haddad, F ;
Reintgen, DS .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1998, 227 (05) :645-653
[5]   Multi-institutional melanoma lymphatic mapping experience: The prognostic value of sentinel lymph node status in 612 stage I or II melanoma patients [J].
Gershenwald, JE ;
Thompson, W ;
Mansfield, PF ;
Lee, JE ;
Colome, MI ;
Tseng, CH ;
Lee, JJ ;
Balch, CM ;
Reintgen, DS ;
Ross, MI .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 17 (03) :976-983
[6]  
Giuliano AE, 1996, J SURG ONCOL, V62, P75, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9098(199606)62:2<75::AID-JSO1>3.0.CO
[7]  
2-N
[8]  
Guenther JM, 1997, CANCER J SCI AM, V3, P336
[9]   Reliability of sentinel node status in predicting axillary lymph node involvement in breast cancer [J].
Kollias, J ;
Gill, PG ;
Chatterton, BE ;
Hall, VE ;
Bochner, MA ;
Coventry, BJ ;
Farshid, G .
MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 1999, 171 (09) :461-465
[10]   The sentinel node in breast cancer - A multicenter validation study [J].
Krag, D ;
Weaver, D ;
Ashikaga, T ;
Moffat, F ;
Klimberg, VS ;
Shriver, C ;
Feldman, S ;
Kusminsky, R ;
Gadd, M ;
Kuhn, J ;
Harlow, S ;
Beitsch, P .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1998, 339 (14) :941-946