Looking for the optimal DTI acquisition scheme given a maximum scan time: are more b-values a waste of time?

被引:43
作者
Correia, Marta Morgado [1 ]
Carpenter, Thomas A. [1 ]
Williams, Guy B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Wolfson Brain Imaging Ctr, Cambridge CB2 1DQ, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
DTI acquisiton scheme; Multiple b-values; Apparent diffusion coefficient; Anisotropy; Fibre orientation; Noise; APPARENT DIFFUSION-COEFFICIENT; HUMAN BRAIN; TENSOR MRI; ANISOTROPY; ECHO;
D O I
10.1016/j.mri.2008.06.011
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
In this study we used simulated data to investigate how valuable the use of multiple b-values is, in terms of improving the accuracy and reproducibility of Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) results. Our results show that the systematic bias of the estimated scalar diffusion parameters [apparent diffusion coefficient and fractional anisotropy (FA)] - due to the Rician distribution of magnetic resonance noise can he minimized by increasing the number of h-values and not by increasing die number of sampling directions. In addition, the use of more than one b-value accounts better for the wide range of diffusivities found in the Iranian brain by bringing closer together the FA estimates for fibres with different mean diffusivities. It is also shown that while for tractography Studies we should use as many sampling directions as allowed by Scan time limitations, for follow-up, intersubject or multicenter studies, the use of more than one b-value will improve the accuracy of the scalar diffusion parameters, as long as the minimum number of direction,-, required for robust estimation of each parameter is still used. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:163 / 175
页数:13
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Diffusion-tensor MRI: theory, experimental design and data analysis - a technical review [J].
Basser, PJ ;
Jones, DK .
NMR IN BIOMEDICINE, 2002, 15 (7-8) :456-467
[2]   ESTIMATION OF THE EFFECTIVE SELF-DIFFUSION TENSOR FROM THE NMR SPIN-ECHO [J].
BASSER, PJ ;
MATTIELLO, J ;
LEBIHAN, D .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE SERIES B, 1994, 103 (03) :247-254
[3]  
BRUNBERG JA, 1995, AM J NEURORADIOL, V16, P361
[4]  
Clark CA, 2000, MAGN RESON MED, V44, P852, DOI 10.1002/1522-2594(200012)44:6<852::AID-MRM5>3.0.CO
[5]  
2-A
[6]   THE RICIAN DISTRIBUTION OF NOISY MRI DATA [J].
GUDBJARTSSON, H ;
PATZ, S .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1995, 34 (06) :910-914
[7]   Comparison of gradient encoding schemes for diffusion-tensor MRI [J].
Hasan, KM ;
Parker, DL ;
Alexander, AL .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2001, 13 (05) :769-780
[8]  
Hüppi PS, 1998, PEDIATR RES, V44, P584
[9]  
JONES DK, 2004, EFFECT GRADIENT SAMP
[10]  
JONES DK, 2007, P ISMRM 15 SCI M BER