Cisplatin, gemcitabine, and vinorelbine combination therapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: A phase II randomized study of the Southern Italy Cooperative Oncology Group

被引:69
作者
Comella, P
Frasci, G
Panza, N
Manzione, L
Lorusso, V
Di Rienzo, G
Cioffi, R
De Cataldis, G
Maiorino, L
Bilancia, D
Nicolella, G
Natale, M
Carpagnano, F
Pacilio, C
De Lena, M
Bianco, A
Comella, G
机构
[1] Natl Tumor Inst, Div Med Oncol A, I-80131 Naples, Italy
[2] Cardarelli Hosp, Div Med Oncol, Naples, Italy
[3] Cardarelli Hosp, Div Pneumol, Naples, Italy
[4] San Carlo Hosp, Div Med Oncol, Potenza, Italy
[5] Inst Oncol, Div Med Oncol, Bari, Italy
[6] San Paolo Hosp, Div Thorac Surg, Bari, Italy
[7] Gen Hosp, Div Pneumol, Caserta, Italy
[8] Da Procida Hosp, Med Oncol Unit, Salerno, Italy
[9] San Gennaro Hosp, Med Oncol Unit, Naples, Italy
[10] Univ Naples 2, Sch Med, Dept Resp Dis, Naples, Italy
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JCO.1999.17.5.1526
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: In a previous phase I study cisplatin (CDDP), gemcitabine (GEM), and vinorelbine (VNR) combination therapy was safe and very active in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study was aimed at better defining the activity and toxicity of this regimen. Patients and Methods: One hundred eleven chemotherapy-naive patients, age less than or equal to 70 years, with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC and a performance status of 0 or 1 (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group scale) were randomized to two treatment arms. Patients on arm A received CDDP 50 mg/m(2), GEM 1,000 mg/m(2), and VNR 25 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 of an every-3-weeks cycle (57 patients). Patients on arm B received CDDP 80 mg/m(2), epirubicin 80 mg/m(2), and vindesine 3 mg/m(2), all delivered on day 1 every 4 weeks, plus lonidamine orally 150 mg three times daily (54 patients). In December 1996, randomization was stopped early, and an additional 30 patients were treated with the experimental regimen to obtain a more accurate estimation of its activity rare. Results: Among 87 patients who received the CDDP-GEM-VNR combination, four complete responses (CRs) and 46 partial responses (PRs) were observed, for an overall response rate of 57% (95% confidence interval [CI], 46% to 68%). Two CRs and 18 PRs were recorded among 54 patients on arm B, giving a 37% activity rate (95% CI, 24% to 51%). After a median follow-up duration of 19 months, the median progression-free and overall survival durations were 32 and 50 weeks in arm A, and 18 and 33 weeks in arm B, respectively. World Health Organization grade 3 to 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 46% and 14% of patients in arm A and in 22% and 11% of those in arm B, respectively. Severe nonhematologic toxicity was uncommon in both arms. Conclusion: The CDDP-GEM-VNR combination is a highly effective treatment for patients with advanced NSCLC and has a manageable toxicity A phase III trial comparing this new combination with both CDDP-VNR and CDDP-GEM regimens is underway J Clin Oncol 17:1526-1534. (C) 1999 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
引用
收藏
页码:1526 / 1534
页数:9
相关论文
共 35 条
[21]   RANDOMIZED STUDY OF VINORELBINE AND CISPLATIN VERSUS VINDESINE AND CISPLATIN VERSUS VINORELBINE ALONE IN ADVANCED NON-SMALL-CELL LUNG-CANCER - RESULTS OF A EUROPEAN MULTICENTER TRIAL INCLUDING 612 PATIENTS [J].
LECHEVALIER, T ;
BRISGAND, D ;
DOUILLARD, JY ;
PUJOL, JL ;
ALBEROLA, V ;
MONNIER, A ;
RIVIERE, A ;
LIANES, P ;
CHOMY, P ;
CIGOLARI, S ;
GOTTFRIED, M ;
RUFFIE, P ;
PANIZO, A ;
GASPARD, MH ;
RAVAIOLI, A ;
BESENVAL, M ;
BESSEN, F ;
MARTINEZ, A ;
BERTHAUD, P ;
TURSZ, T .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1994, 12 (02) :360-367
[22]   NOVEL CHEMOTHERAPEUTIC-AGENTS IN THE TREATMENT OF NON-SMALL-CELL LUNG-CANCER [J].
LILENBAUM, RC ;
GREEN, MR .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1993, 11 (07) :1391-1402
[23]   CLINICAL AND PRECLINICAL ACTIVITY OF 2',2'-DIFLUORODEOXYCYTIDINE (GEMCITABINE) [J].
LUND, B ;
KRISTJANSEN, PEG ;
HANSEN, HH .
CANCER TREATMENT REVIEWS, 1993, 19 (01) :45-55
[24]   Single-agent gemcitabine versus cisplatin-etoposide: Early results of a randomised phase II study in locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer [J].
Manegold, C ;
Bergman, B ;
Chemaissani, A ;
Dornoff, W ;
Drings, P ;
KellokumpuLehtinen, P ;
Liippo, K ;
Mattson, K ;
vonPawel, J ;
Ricci, S ;
Sederholm, C ;
Stahel, RA ;
Wagenius, G ;
vonWalree, N ;
tenBokkelHuinink, W .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 1997, 8 (06) :525-529
[25]  
MILLER AB, 1981, CANCER, V47, P207, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19810101)47:1<207::AID-CNCR2820470134>3.0.CO
[26]  
2-6
[27]   Response to chemotherapy has predictive value for further survival of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: 10 years experience of the European Lung Cancer Working Party [J].
Paesmans, M ;
Sculier, JP ;
Libert, P ;
Bureau, G ;
Dabouis, G ;
Thiriaux, J ;
Michel, J ;
Van Cutsem, O ;
Sergysels, R ;
Mommen, P ;
Klastersky, J .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1997, 33 (14) :2326-2332
[28]   Gemcitabine versus the combination of cisplatin and etoposide in patients with inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer in a phase II randomized study [J].
Perng, RP ;
Chen, YM ;
MingLiu, J ;
Tsai, CM ;
Lin, WC ;
Yang, KY ;
WhangPeng, J .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1997, 15 (05) :2097-2102
[29]  
PETERS GJ, 1995, SEMIN ONCOL, V22, P72
[30]   A RANDOMIZED TRIAL COMPARING PREOPERATIVE CHEMOTHERAPY PLUS SURGERY WITH SURGERY ALONE IN PATIENTS WITH NON-SMALL-CELL LUNG-CANCER [J].
ROSELL, R ;
GOMEZCODINA, J ;
CAMPS, C ;
MAESTRE, J ;
PADILLE, J ;
CANTO, A ;
MATE, JL ;
LI, SR ;
ROIG, J ;
OLAZABAL, A ;
CANELA, M ;
ARIZA, A ;
SKACEL, Z ;
MORERAPRAT, J ;
ABAD, A .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1994, 330 (03) :153-158