Canal length evaluation of curved canals by direct digital or conventional radiography

被引:31
作者
Mentes, A
Gencoglu, N
机构
[1] Marmara Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Pediat Dent, TR-80200 Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Marmara Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Endodont, TR-80200 Istanbul, Turkey
来源
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS | 2002年 / 93卷 / 01期
关键词
D O I
10.1067/moe.2002.119466
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives. The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of a digital radiograph imaging system (DDR) with conventional radiography for the purpose of estimating endodontic file lengths in curved canals of mandibular molars. Study design. Sixty extracted human mandibular molars with root curvatures ranging from 5degrees to 52degrees were mounted in plastic blocks. Canal length was estimated by using on-screen DDR with both 2- and 3-click measurement and from conventional E-speed radiographs by using a millimeter ruler and x2 magnification. Two operators familiar with both radiographic methods performed the estimates. Results. One-way analysis of variance and Newman-Keuls tests revealed no significant differences between the groups. Although both conventional and DDR methods of analysis overestimated the true canal length, the DDR accuracy improved as the curvature severity increased. Conclusions. The image quality of DDR systems has improved to the point that they can now be used for estimating canal lengths, even for curved canals, with accuracy comparable to that of conventional radiographs. However, further work remains to be done to optimize image quality.
引用
收藏
页码:88 / 91
页数:4
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
Borg E, 1996, ENDOD DENT TRAUMATOL, V12, P20
[2]   Direct digital radiography versus conventional radiography for estimation of canal length in curved canals [J].
Burger, CL ;
Mork, TO ;
Hutter, JW ;
Nicoll, B .
JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 1999, 25 (04) :260-263
[3]   Endodontic working length assessment - Comparison of storage phosphor digital imaging and radiographic film [J].
Cederberg, RA ;
Tidwell, E ;
Frederiksen, NL ;
Benson, BW .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS, 1998, 85 (03) :325-328
[4]  
Certosimo Fred J., 1999, General Dentistry, V47, P281
[5]  
CURRY TS, 1990, CHRISTENSENS PHYSICS, P219
[6]   RADIOGRAPHIC REPRODUCTION OF ENDODONTIC WORKING LENGTH COMPARING THE PARALLELING AND THE BISECTING-ANGLE TECHNIQUES [J].
FORSBERG, J .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS, 1987, 64 (03) :353-360
[7]   Evaluation of a digital radiography to estimate working length [J].
Garcia, AA ;
Navarro, LF ;
Castello, VU ;
Laliga, RM .
JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 1997, 23 (06) :363-365
[8]   COMPARISON OF 3 IMAGING TECHNIQUES FOR ASSESSING ENDODONTIC WORKING LENGTH [J].
GRIFFITHS, BM ;
BROWN, JE ;
HYATT, AT ;
LINNEY, AD .
INTERNATIONAL ENDODONTIC JOURNAL, 1992, 25 (06) :279-287
[9]  
GUTMANN JL, 1984, PATHWAYS PULP, P156
[10]   RADIOGRAPHIC DETERMINATION OF CANAL LENGTH - DIRECT DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY VERSUS CONVENTIONAL RADIOGRAPHY [J].
HEDRICK, RT ;
DOVE, SB ;
PETERS, DD ;
MCDAVID, WD .
JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 1994, 20 (07) :320-326