Key issues in making and using satellite-based maps in ecology: A primer

被引:65
作者
Fassnacht, KS [1 ]
Cohen, WB [1 ]
Spies, TA [1 ]
机构
[1] USDA, Forest Serv, Pacific NW Res Stn, Forestry Sci Lab, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA
关键词
classification; scale; accuracy assessment; remote sensing; satellite;
D O I
10.1016/j.foreco.2005.09.026
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
The widespread availability of satellite imagery and image processing software has made it relatively easy for ecologists to use satellite imagery to address questions at the landscape and regional scales. However, as often happens with complex tools that are rendered easy to use by computer software, technology may be misused or used without an understanding of some of the limitations or caveats associated with a particular application. The results can be disappointment when maps are less accurate than expected or incorrect decisions when they are treated as truth. In this paper. we discuss several key issues which are critical to ensuring the effectiveness and value of remote sensing products, but which are also sometimes sources of confusion: (1) direct versus indirect models of land surface properties and processes, (2) differences between class-based and continuous mapping models, (3) scale, and (4) accuracy assessment. We illustrate our points with examples from the application of satellite imagery to forest management issues in the Pacific Northwest, USA. While our examples focus largely on Landsat image data, the issues we discuss have broad relevance across sensor data types, land cover properties, and geographic locations. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:167 / 181
页数:15
相关论文
共 67 条
[41]  
O'Neill RV, 1998, COM ECO SYS, P3
[42]   Predictive mapping of forest composition and structure with direct gradient analysis and nearest-neighbor imputation in coastal Oregon, USA [J].
Ohmann, JL ;
Gregory, MJ .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH, 2002, 32 (04) :725-741
[43]   Scale problems in reporting landscape pattern at the regional scale [J].
ONeill, RV ;
Hunsaker, CT ;
Timmins, SP ;
Jackson, BL ;
Jones, KB ;
Riitters, KH ;
Wickham, JD .
LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 1996, 11 (03) :169-180
[44]   Improving spectral results in a GIS context [J].
PalacioPrieto, JL ;
LunaGonzalez, L .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 1996, 17 (11) :2201-2209
[45]  
PERRY L, 1998, LAND COVER WISCONSIN
[46]   Remotely sensed data for ecosystem analyses: Combining hierarchy theory and scene models [J].
Phinn, SR ;
Stow, DA ;
Franklin, J ;
Mertes, LAK ;
Michaelsen, J .
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2003, 31 (03) :429-441
[47]   Optimizing remotely sensed solutions for monitoring, modeling, and managing coastal environments [J].
Phinn, SR ;
Menges, C ;
Hill, GJE ;
Stanford, M .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2000, 73 (02) :117-132
[48]  
QUATTROCHI DA, 1991, QUANTITATIVE METHODS, P67
[49]   Radiometric nomenclatures and spatial resolutions [J].
Raffy, M ;
Blamont, D .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2003, 24 (11) :2289-2307
[50]   REMOTE-SENSING OF CONIFEROUS FOREST LEAF-AREA [J].
RUNNING, SW ;
PETERSON, DL ;
SPANNER, MA ;
TEUBER, KB .
ECOLOGY, 1986, 67 (01) :273-276