Two separate mechanisms underlie auditory change detection and involuntary control of attention

被引:160
作者
Rinne, T
Särkkä, A
Degerman, A
Schröger, E
Alho, K
机构
[1] Univ Helsinki, Dept Psychol, Cognit Brain Res Unit, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland
[2] Univ Calif Davis, Human Cognit Neurophysiol Lab, Martinez, CA 95616 USA
[3] VANCHCS, Martinez, CA 95616 USA
[4] Univ Leipzig, Inst Psychol, Leipzig, Germany
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
auditory change detection; distraction; event-related potential; N1; MMN; P3a;
D O I
10.1016/j.brainres.2006.01.043
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
We used behavioral and event-related potential (ERP) measures to study the neural mechanisms of involuntary attention switching to changes in unattended sounds. Our subjects discriminated two equiprobable sounds differing in frequency (fundamental frequency 186 or 196 Hz) while task-irrelevant intensity decrements or increments (-3, -6, -9, +3, +6, or +9 dB, standard intensity 60 dB HL) infrequently occurred in the same sounds. in line with the results of previous studies, discrimination performance deteriorated with increasing magnitude of the task-irrelevant intensity change. However, these distraction effects were dissimilar for intensity increments and decrements: while there were no differences in reaction time (RT) between intensity decrements and increments, hit rates (HR) were lower for large intensity increments than for large decrements. ERPs to task-irrelevant intensity increments and decrements were also distinctly different: the response to intensity increments consisted of an N1 enhancement, mismatch negativity (MMN), and P3a, while the response to intensity decrements consisted only of MMN. These results are consistent with the assumption that two separate mechanisms (indexed by N1 and MMN) underlie auditory change detection. However, the finding that distinct distraction effects were obtained for both intensity decrements and increments but that the P3a is elicited only by the intensity increments seems to suggest that P3a may not be regarded as a general index of attentional shift but rather it is only generated in conditions in which an enhanced N1 is elicited, too. (C) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:135 / 143
页数:9
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Tryptophan depletion effects on EEG and MEG responses suggest serotonergic modulation of auditory involuntary attention in humans [J].
Ahveninen, J ;
Kähkönen, S ;
Pennanen, S ;
Liesivuori, J ;
Ilmoniemi, RJ ;
Jääskeläinen, IP .
NEUROIMAGE, 2002, 16 (04) :1052-1061
[2]  
Alho K, 1998, PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, V35, P211, DOI 10.1111/1469-8986.3520211
[3]   Bottom-up influences on working memory:: Behavioral and electrophysiological distraction varies with distractor strength [J].
Berti, S ;
Roeber, U ;
Schröger, E .
EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 51 (04) :249-257
[5]   Stimulus processing constraints in audition [J].
Dyson, BJ ;
Quinlan, PT .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2004, 30 (06) :1117-1131
[6]   Involuntary attention and distractibility as evaluated with event-related brain potentials [J].
Escera, C ;
Alho, K ;
Schröger, E ;
Winkler, I .
AUDIOLOGY AND NEURO-OTOLOGY, 2000, 5 (3-4) :151-166
[7]   Neural mechanisms of involuntary attention to acoustic novelty and change [J].
Escera, C ;
Alho, K ;
Winkler, I ;
t nen, RN .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 1998, 10 (05) :590-604
[8]   The novelty P3: an event-related brain potential (ERP) sign of the brain's evaluation of novelty [J].
Friedman, D ;
Cycowicz, YM ;
Gaeta, H .
NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS, 2001, 25 (04) :355-373
[9]   Preattentive memory-based comparison of sound intensity [J].
Jacobsen, T ;
Horenkamp, T ;
Schröger, E .
AUDIOLOGY AND NEURO-OTOLOGY, 2003, 8 (06) :338-346
[10]   PRIVILEGED ACCESS BY IRRELEVANT SPEECH TO SHORT-TERM-MEMORY - THE ROLE OF CHANGING STATE [J].
JONES, D ;
MADDEN, C ;
MILES, C .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY SECTION A-HUMAN EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 44 (04) :645-669