Climate Risks and Carbon Prices: Revising the Social Cost of Carbon

被引:135
作者
Ackerman, Frank [1 ]
Stanton, Elizabeth A. [1 ]
机构
[1] US Ctr, Stockholm Environm Inst, Somerville, MA 02144 USA
来源
ECONOMICS-THE OPEN ACCESS OPEN-ASSESSMENT E-JOURNAL | 2012年 / 6卷
关键词
Social cost of carbon; cost-benefit analysis; climate policy; climate economics; STABILIZATION; ECONOMICS; SCENARIOS; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2012-10
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The social cost of carbon - or marginal damage caused by an additional ton of carbon dioxide emissions - has been estimated by a U.S. government working group at $21/tCO(2) in 2010. That calculation, however, omits many of the biggest risks associated with climate change, and downplays the impact of current emissions on future generations. Our reanalysis explores the effects of uncertainty about climate sensitivity, the shape of the damage function, and the discount rate. We show that the social cost of carbon is uncertain across a broad range, and could be much higher than $21/tCO(2). In our case combining high climate sensitivity, high damages, and a low discount rate, the social cost of carbon could be almost $900/tCO(2) in 2010, rising to $1,500/tCO(2) in 2050. The most ambitious scenarios for eliminating carbon dioxide emissions as rapidly as technologically feasible (reaching zero or negative net global emissions by the end of this century) require spending up to $150 to $500 per ton of reductions of carbon dioxide emissions by 2050. Using a reasonable set of alternative assumptions, therefore, the damages from a ton of carbon dioxide emissions in 2050 could exceed the cost of reducing emissions at the maximum technically feasible rate. Once this is the case, the exact value of the social cost of carbon loses importance: the clear policy prescription is to reduce emissions as rapidly as possible, and cost-effectiveness analysis offers better insights for climate policy than cost-benefit analysis.
引用
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [21] Why is climate sensitivity so unpredictable?
    Roe, Gerard H.
    Baker, Marcia B.
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2007, 318 (5850) : 629 - 632
  • [22] An adaptability limit to climate change due to heat stress
    Sherwood, Steven C.
    Huber, Matthew
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2010, 107 (21) : 9552 - 9555
  • [23] Stern N., 2006, The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review, DOI [DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511817434, 10.1017/CBO9780511817434]
  • [24] RCP2.6: exploring the possibility to keep global mean temperature increase below 2°C
    van Vuuren, Detlef P.
    Stehfest, Elke
    den Elzen, Michel G. J.
    Kram, Tom
    van Vliet, Jasper
    Deetman, Sebastiaan
    Isaac, Morna
    Goldewijk, Kees Klein
    Hof, Andries
    Beltran, Angelica Mendoza
    Oostenrijk, Rineke
    van Ruijven, Bas
    [J]. CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2011, 109 (1-2) : 95 - 116
  • [25] van Vuuren DP, 2010, ENERG J, V31, P165
  • [26] How well do integrated assessment models simulate climate change?
    van Vuuren, Detlef P.
    Lowe, Jason
    Stehfest, Elke
    Gohar, Laila
    Hof, Andries F.
    Hope, Chris
    Warren, Rachel
    Meinshausen, Malte
    Plattner, Gian-Kasper
    [J]. CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2011, 104 (02) : 255 - 285
  • [27] ON MODELING AND INTERPRETING THE ECONOMICS OF CATASTROPHIC CLIMATE CHANGE
    Weitzman, Martin L.
    [J]. REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2009, 91 (01) : 1 - 19
  • [28] Weitzman Martin L., 2010, GHG Targets as Insurance Against Catastrophic Climate Damages