Self-referent information-processing in individuals at high and low cognitive risk for depression

被引:61
作者
Alloy, LB
Abramson, LY
Murray, LA
Whitehouse, WG
Hogan, ME
机构
[1] UNIV WISCONSIN, DEPT PSYCHOL, MADISON, WI 53706 USA
[2] TEMPLE UNIV, PHILADELPHIA, PA 19122 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1080/026999397379854a
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Whereas prior work has demonstrated that depressed persons exhibit preferential processing of negative self-referent information, the present study investigated whether persons who are cognitively vulnerable to depression show similar negative self-referent processing. Nondepressed participants in the Temple-Wisconsin Cognitive Vulnerability to Depression Project who were at hypothesised high or low cognitive risk for depression based on their dysfunctional attitudes and inferential styles were administered a Self-referent Information Processing Task Battery that yielded five information-processing measures: judgements of self-descriptiveness (''Me/Not Me'') of trait words; response times for these judgements; past behavioural examples for self-descriptive words; future behavioural predictions; and correct recall of the trait words. Each dependent measure yielded scores for four types of stimuli in a Valence x Content design: positive and negative stimuli that were either relevant or irrelevant to a depressive self-concept. Consistent with prediction, relative to low cognitive risk participants, high cognitive risk participants exhibited greater processing of negative seif-referent information and less processing of positive self-referent information on all measures. Moreover, there was some evidence that risk group differences in self-referent processing biases were greater for depression-relevant than for depression-irrelevant content domains. The findings are discussed with respect to theoretical and methodological implications for the cognitive theories of depression.
引用
收藏
页码:539 / 568
页数:30
相关论文
共 76 条
[21]   PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF THE BECK DEPRESSION INVENTORY - 25 YEARS OF EVALUATION [J].
BECK, AT ;
STEER, RA ;
GARBIN, MG .
CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 1988, 8 (01) :77-100
[22]   COGNITIVE-STYLE IN DEPRESSION [J].
BLACKBURN, IM ;
JONES, S ;
LEWIN, RJP .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 25 :241-251
[23]   The efficacy of 2 different dosages of methylphenidate in treating adults with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder [J].
Bouffard, R ;
Hechtman, L ;
Minde, K ;
Iaboni-Kassab, F .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHIATRIE, 2003, 48 (08) :546-554
[24]   Memory Bias in Recovered Clinical Depressives [J].
Bradley, Brendan P. ;
Mathews, Andrew .
COGNITION & EMOTION, 1988, 2 (03) :235-245
[25]   SELF-SERVING BIASES IN ATTRIBUTION PROCESS - RE-EXAMINATION OF FACT OR FICTION QUESTION [J].
BRADLEY, GW .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1978, 36 (01) :56-71
[26]  
Brewer W. F., 1984, HDB SOCIAL COGNITION, V1, P119
[27]   A COEFFICIENT OF AGREEMENT FOR NOMINAL SCALES [J].
COHEN, J .
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1960, 20 (01) :37-46
[28]   DEPTH OF PROCESSING AND RETENTION OF WORDS IN EPISODIC MEMORY [J].
CRAIK, FIM ;
TULVING, E .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 1975, 104 (03) :268-294
[29]   SCHEMATIC PROCESSING AND SELF-REFERENCE IN CLINICAL DEPRESSION [J].
DERRY, PA ;
KUIPER, NA .
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1981, 90 (04) :286-297
[30]  
DINARDO P, 1985, ANXIETY DISORDERS IN