A wavelet-based algorithm for detecting clustered microcalcifications in digital mammograms

被引:40
作者
Lado, MJ
Tahoces, PG
Méndez, AJ
Souto, M
Vidal, JJ
机构
[1] Univ Santiago Compostela, Dept Elect & Comp Sci, Santiago De Compostela, Spain
[2] Complejo Hosp Univ de Santiago, Santiago, Spain
关键词
computer-aided diagnosis; digital mammography; microcalcifications; wavelet transform;
D O I
10.1118/1.598624
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
A computerized scheme to detect clustered microcalcifications in digital mammograms has been developed. Detection of individual microcalcifications in regions. of interest (ROIs) was also performed. The mammograms were previously classified into fatty and dense, according to their breast tissue. The most appropriate wavelet basis and reconstruction levels were selected. To select the wavelet basis, 40 profiles of microcalcifications were decomposed and reconstructed using different types of wavelet functions and different combinations of wavelet coefficients. The symlets with a basis of length 8 were chosen for fatty tissue. For dense tissue, the Daubechies' wavelets with a four-element basis were employed. Two methods to detect individual microcalcifications were evaluated: (a) two-dimensional wavelet transform, and (b) one-dimensional wavelet transform. The second technique yielded the best results, and was used to detect clustered microcalcifications in the complete mammogram. When detecting individual microcalcifications by using two-dimensional wavelet transform we have obtained, for fatty ROIs, a sensitivity of 71.11% at a false positive: rate of 7.13 per image. For dense ROIs the sensitivity was 60.76% and the false positive rate, 7.33. The areas (Al) under the AFROC curves were 0.33+/-0.04 and 0.28+/-0.02, respectively. The one-dimensional wavelet transform method yielded 80.44% of sensitivity and 6.43 false positives per image (A(1)=0.39+/-0.03) for fatty ROIs, and 62.17% and 5.82 false positives per image (A(1) =0.37+/-0.02) for dense ROIs. For the detection of clusters of microcalcifications in the entire mammogram, the sensitivity was 80.00% with 0.94 false positives per image (A(1)=0.77+/-0.09) for fatty mammograms, and 72.85% of sensitivity at a false positive detection rate of 2.21 per image (A(1)=0.64+/-0.07) for dense mammograms. Globally, a sensitivity of 76.43% at a false positive detection rate of 1.57 per image was obtained. (C) 1999 American Association of Physicists in Medicine. [S0094-2405(99)01407-8].
引用
收藏
页码:1294 / 1305
页数:12
相关论文
共 42 条
[22]  
MONSEES BS, 1995, RADIOL CLIN N AM, V33, P1109
[23]   ISOLATED CLUSTERED MICROCALCIFICATIONS IN BREAST - RADIOLOGIC-PATHOLOGIC CORRELATION [J].
MURPHY, WA ;
DESCHRYVERKECSKEMETI, K .
RADIOLOGY, 1978, 127 (02) :335-341
[24]   COMPUTER-AIDED DETECTION OF CLUSTERED MICROCALCIFICATIONS - AN IMPROVED METHOD FOR GROUPING DETECTED SIGNALS [J].
NISHIKAWA, RM ;
GIGER, ML ;
DOI, K ;
VYBORNY, CJ ;
SCHMIDT, RA .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1993, 20 (06) :1661-1666
[25]   EFFECT OF CASE SELECTION ON THE PERFORMANCE OF COMPUTER-AIDED DETECTION SCHEMES [J].
NISHIKAWA, RM ;
GIGER, ML ;
DOI, K ;
METZ, CE ;
YIN, FF ;
VYBORNY, CJ ;
SCHMIDT, RA .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1994, 21 (02) :265-269
[26]  
Norusis M. J., 1992, SPSS for Windows: Professional Statistics User's Guide
[27]   TREE-STRUCTURED WAVELET TRANSFORM SEGMENTATION OF MICROCALCIFICATIONS IN DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY [J].
QIAN, W ;
KALLERGI, M ;
CLARKE, LP ;
LI, HD ;
VENUGOPAL, P ;
SONG, DS ;
CLARK, RA .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1995, 22 (08) :1247-1254
[28]   Detection of subtle abnormalities on chest radiographs after irreversible compression [J].
Savcenko, V ;
Erickson, BJ ;
Palisson, PM ;
Persons, KR ;
Manduca, A ;
Hartman, TE ;
Harms, GF ;
Brown, LR .
RADIOLOGY, 1998, 206 (03) :609-616
[29]   APPLICATION OF SHAPE-ANALYSIS TO MAMMOGRAPHIC CALCIFICATIONS [J].
SHEN, L ;
RANGAYYAN, RM ;
DESAUTELS, JEL .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 1994, 13 (02) :263-274
[30]   MAMMOGRAPHIC FEATURES OF 300 CONSECUTIVE NONPALPABLE BREAST CANCERS [J].
SICKLES, EA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1986, 146 (04) :661-663