An ordinal optimization theory-based algorithm for a class of simulation optimization problems and application

被引:21
作者
Horng, Shih-Cheng [1 ]
Lin, Shieh-Shing [1 ]
机构
[1] Chaoyang Univ Technol, Dept Comp Sci & Informat Engn, Wufong Township 41349, Taichung County, Taiwan
关键词
Ordinal optimization; Stochastic simulation optimization; Artificial neural network; Genetic algorithm; Wafer probe testing;
D O I
10.1016/j.eswa.2009.01.023
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
In this paper, we have proposed ail ordinal optimization theory-based two-stage algorithm to solve for a good enough Solution of the stochastic simulation optimization problem with huge input-variable space circle minus. In the first stage, we construct a crude but effective model for the considered problem based oil ail artificial neural network. This crude model will then be used as a fitness function evaluation tool ill a genetic algorithm to select N excellent settings from (-). In the second stage, starting front the selected N excellent settings we proceed with the existing goal softening searching procedures to search for a good enough solution of the considered problem. We applied the proposed algorithm to the reduction of overkills and retests in a wafer probe testing process, which is formulated as a stochastic: simulation optimization problem that consists of a huge input-variable space formed by the vector of threshold values in the testing process. The vector of good enough threshold values obtained by the proposed algorithm is promising in the aspects of solution quality and computational efficiency. We have also justified the performance of the proposed algorithm in a wafer probe testing process based on the ordinal optimization theory (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:9340 / 9349
页数:10
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   A modification of the simulated annealing algorithm for discrete stochastic optimization [J].
Ahmed, Mohamed A. .
ENGINEERING OPTIMIZATION, 2007, 39 (06) :701-714
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2004, Wiley InterScience electronic collection.
[3]   Practical introduction to simulation optimization [J].
April, J ;
Glover, F ;
Kelly, JP ;
Laguna, M .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2003 WINTER SIMULATION CONFERENCE, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2003, :71-78
[4]   Exploiting prediction defect clustering for yield and reliability [J].
Barnett, TS ;
Grady, M ;
Purdy, K ;
Singh, AD .
IEE PROCEEDINGS-COMPUTERS AND DIGITAL TECHNIQUES, 2005, 152 (03) :407-413
[5]   1ST-ORDER AND 2ND-ORDER METHODS FOR LEARNING - BETWEEN STEEPEST DESCENT AND NEWTON METHOD [J].
BATTITI, R .
NEURAL COMPUTATION, 1992, 4 (02) :141-166
[6]   Metaheuristics in combinatorial optimization: Overview and conceptual comparison [J].
Blum, C ;
Roli, A .
ACM COMPUTING SURVEYS, 2003, 35 (03) :268-308
[7]   Ordinal comparison of heuristic algorithms using stochastic optimization [J].
Chen, CH ;
Wu, SD ;
Dai, LY .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION, 1999, 15 (01) :44-56
[8]   LOGIC product yield analysis by wafer bin map pattern recognition supervised neural network [J].
Chen, FL ;
Lin, SC ;
Doong, KYY ;
Young, KL .
2003 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, 2003, :501-504
[9]  
COLLETTE P, 2003, MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIM
[10]   Mathematical modeling and heuristic approaches to flexible job shop scheduling problems [J].
Fattahi, Parviz ;
Mehrabad, Mohammad Saidi ;
Jolai, Fariborz .
JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT MANUFACTURING, 2007, 18 (03) :331-342