Tomato Susceptibility to Root-Knot Nematodes Requires an Intact Jasmonic Acid Signaling Pathway

被引:148
作者
Bhattarai, Kishor K. [1 ]
Xie, Qi-Guang [1 ]
Mantelin, Sophie [1 ]
Bishnoi, Usha [1 ]
Girke, Thomas [2 ]
Navarre, Duroy A. [3 ]
Kaloshian, Isgouhi [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Riverside, Dept Nematol, Ctr Plant Cell Biol, Riverside, CA 92521 USA
[2] Univ Calif Riverside, Dept Bot & Plant Sci, Ctr Plant Cell Biol, Riverside, CA 92521 USA
[3] Washington State Univ, USDA, ARS, Prosser, WA 99350 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Coi-I; plant defense; prate incise inhibitors;
D O I
10.1094/MPMI-21-9-1205
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Responses of resistant (Mi-1/Mi-1) and susceptible (mi-1/mi-1) tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) to root-knot nematodes (RKNs; Meloidogyne spp.) infection were monitored using cDNA microarrays, and the roles of salicylic acid (SA) and,jasmonic acid (JA) defense signaling were evaluated in these interactions. Array analysis was used to compare transcript profiles in incompatible and compatible interactions of tomato roots 24 h after RKN infestation. The jail and defI tomato mutant, altered in JA signaling, and tomato transgenic line NahG, altered in SA signaling, in the presence or absence of the RKN resistance gene Mi-I, were evaluated. The array analysis identified 1,497 and 750 genes differentially regulated in the incompatible and compatible interactions, respectively. Of the differentially regulated genes, 37% were specific to the incompatible interactions. NahG affected neither Mi-I resistance nor basal defenses to RKNs. However, jail reduced tomato susceptibility to RKNs while not affecting Mi-1 resistance. In contrast, the def1 mutant did not affect RKN susceptibility. These results indicate that JA-dependent signaling does not play a role in Mi-1-mediated defense; however, an intact JA signaling pathway is required for tomato susceptibility to RKNs. In addition, low levels of SA might be sufficient for basal and Mi-1 resistance to RKNs.
引用
收藏
页码:1205 / 1214
页数:10
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]   ESTs, cDNA microarrays, and gene expression profiling: tools for dissecting plant physiology and development [J].
Alba, R ;
Fei, ZJ ;
Payton, P ;
Liu, Y ;
Moore, SL ;
Debbie, P ;
Cohn, J ;
D'Ascenzo, M ;
Gordon, JS ;
Rose, JKC ;
Martin, G ;
Tanksley, SD ;
Bouzayen, M ;
Jahn, MM ;
Giovannoni, J .
PLANT JOURNAL, 2004, 39 (05) :697-714
[2]   A broad characterization of the transcriptional profile of the compatible tomato response to the plant parasitic root knot nematode Meloidogyne java']javanica [J].
Bar-Or, C ;
Kapulnik, Y ;
Koltai, H .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PLANT PATHOLOGY, 2005, 111 (02) :181-192
[3]   Pseudomonas syringae phytotoxins:: Mode of action, regulation, and biosynthesis by peptide and polyketide synthetases [J].
Bender, CL ;
Alarcón-Chaidez, F ;
Gross, DC .
MICROBIOLOGY AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY REVIEWS, 1999, 63 (02) :266-+
[4]   The Mi-1-mediated pest resistance requires Hsp90 and Sgt1 [J].
Bhattarai, Kishor K. ;
Li, Qi ;
Liu, Yule ;
Dinesh-Kumar, Savithramma P. ;
Kaloshian, Isgouhi .
PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 2007, 144 (01) :312-323
[5]   Coi1-dependent signaling pathway is not required for Mi-1-mediated potato aphid resistance [J].
Bhattarai, Kishor K. ;
Xie, Qi-Guang ;
Pourshalimi, Daniel ;
Younglove, Ted ;
Kaloshian, Isgouhi .
MOLECULAR PLANT-MICROBE INTERACTIONS, 2007, 20 (03) :276-282
[6]  
Bird DM, 2000, J PLANT GROWTH REGUL, V19, P183
[7]   The role of GRAS proteins in plant signal transduction and development [J].
Bolle, C .
PLANTA, 2004, 218 (05) :683-692
[8]   Molecular properties of the Xanthomonas AvrRxv effector and global transcriptional changes determined by its expression in resistant tomato plants [J].
Bonshtien, A ;
Lev, A ;
Gibly, A ;
Debbie, P ;
Avni, A ;
Sessa, G .
MOLECULAR PLANT-MICROBE INTERACTIONS, 2005, 18 (04) :300-310
[9]   Signal crosstalk and induced resistance: Straddling the line between cost and benefit [J].
Bostock, RM .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 2005, 43 :545-580
[10]   Plant-specific calmodulin-binding proteins [J].
Bouché, N ;
Yellin, A ;
Snedden, WA ;
Fromm, H .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT BIOLOGY, 2005, 56 :435-466