Prediction and cross-situational consistency of daily behavior across cultures: Testing trait and cultural psychology perspectives

被引:39
作者
Church, A. Timothy [1 ]
Katigbak, Marcia S. [1 ]
Reyes, Jose Alberto S. [2 ]
Salanga, Maria Guadalupe C. [2 ]
Miramontes, Lilia A. [1 ]
Adams, Nerissa B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Washington State Univ, Dept Educ Leadership & Counseling Psychol, Pullman, WA 99164 USA
[2] De La Salle Univ, Counselor Educ Dept, Manila, Philippines
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Cross-cultural; Consistency; Trait psychology; Cultural psychology; Daily behavior;
D O I
10.1016/j.jrp.2008.03.007
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Trait and cultural psychology perspectives on the cross-situational consistency of behavior, and the predictive validity of traits, were tested in a daily process study in the United States (N = 68), an individualistic culture, and the Philippines (N = 80), a collectivistic culture. Participants completed the Revised NEO Personality Inventory [Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NED Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources] and a measure of self-monitoring, then reported their daily behaviors and associated situational contexts for approximately 30 days. Consistent with trait perspectives, the Big Five traits predicted daily behaviors in both cultures, and relative (interindividual) consistency was observed across many, although not all, situational contexts. The frequency of various Big Five behaviors varied across relevant situational contexts in both cultures and, consistent with cultural psychology perspectives, there was a tendency for Filipinos to exhibit greater situational variability than Americans. Self-monitoring showed some ability to account for individual differences in situational variability in the American sample, but not the Filipino sample. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1199 / 1215
页数:17
相关论文
共 93 条
[31]   Situational similarity and behavioral consistency: Subjective, objective, variable-centered, and person-centered approaches [J].
Furr, RM ;
Funder, DC .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN PERSONALITY, 2004, 38 (05) :421-447
[32]   SELF-MONITORING AND RELATIONSHIP ADJUSTMENT - A CROSS-CULTURAL-ANALYSIS [J].
GOODWIN, R ;
SOON, APY .
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1994, 134 (01) :35-39
[33]  
Gudykunst W.B., 1989, COMMUNICATIONS RES R, V6, P7, DOI DOI 10.1080/08824098909359826
[34]   CULTURAL-DIFFERENCES IN SELF-CONSCIOUSNESS AND SELF-MONITORING [J].
GUDYKUNST, WB ;
YANG, SM ;
NISHIDA, T .
COMMUNICATION RESEARCH, 1987, 14 (01) :7-34
[36]  
Hays W.L., 1973, STAT SOCIAL SCI
[37]   Self as cultural product: An examination of East Asian and North American selves [J].
Heine, SJ .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 2001, 69 (06) :881-906
[38]   What's wrong with cross-cultural comparisons of subjective likert scales?: The reference-group effect [J].
Heine, SJ ;
Lehman, DR ;
Peng, KP ;
Greenholtz, J .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 82 (06) :903-918
[39]   Interjudge agreement, self-enhancement, and liking: Cross-cultural divergences [J].
Heine, SJ ;
Renshaw, K .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 2002, 28 (05) :578-587
[40]  
Hettema J, 1998, EUR J PERSONALITY, V12, P231, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0984(199807/08)12:4<231::AID-PER308>3.0.CO