An improved version of the augmented ε-constraint method (AUGMECON2) for finding the exact pareto set in multi-objective integer programming problems

被引:419
作者
Mavrotas, George [1 ]
Florios, Kostas [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Tech Univ Athens, Sch Chem Engn, Lab Ind & Energy Econ, Athens 15780, Greece
关键词
Multi-objective programming; epsilon-Constraint method; Exact pareto set; MULTIPLE OBJECTIVE PROGRAMS; NON-DOMINATED VECTORS; KNAPSACK-PROBLEM; ALGORITHM; EFFICIENT; METAHEURISTICS; SEARCH;
D O I
10.1016/j.amc.2013.03.002
中图分类号
O29 [应用数学];
学科分类号
070104 ;
摘要
Generation (or a posteriori) methods in Multi-Objective Mathematical Programming (MOMP) is the most computationally demanding category among the MOMP approaches. Due to the dramatic increase in computational speed and the improvement of Mathematical Programming algorithms the generation methods become all the more attractive among today's decision makers. In the current paper we present the generation method AUGMECON2 which is an improvement of our development, AUGMECON. Although AUGMECON2 is a general purpose method, we will demonstrate that AUGMECON2 is especially suitable for Multi-Objective Integer Programming (MOIP) problems. Specifically, AUGMECON2 is capable of producing the exact Pareto set in MOIP problems by appropriately tuning its running parameters. In this context, we compare the previous and the new version in a series of new and old benchmarks found in the literature. We also compare AUGMECON2's performance in the generation of the exact Pareto sets with established methods and algorithms based on specific MOIP problems (knapsack, set packing) and on published results. Except from other Mathematical Programming methods, AUGMECON2 is found to be competitive also with Multi-Objective Meta-Heuristics (MOMH) in producing adequate approximations of the Pareto set in Multi-Objective Combinatorial Optimization (MOCO) problems. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:9652 / 9669
页数:18
相关论文
共 58 条
[21]   Approximating multiobjective knapsack problems [J].
Erlebach, T ;
Kellerer, H ;
Pferschy, U .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2002, 48 (12) :1603-1612
[22]   Solving multiobjective, multiconstraint knapsack problems using mathematical programming and evolutionary algorithms [J].
Florios, Kostas ;
Mavrotas, George ;
Diakoulaki, Danae .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2010, 203 (01) :14-21
[23]  
HAIMES YY, 1971, IEEE T SYST MAN CYB, VSMC1, P296
[24]   Finding representative systems for discrete bicriterion optimization problems [J].
Hamacher, Horst W. ;
Pedersen, Christian Roed ;
Ruzika, Stefan .
OPERATIONS RESEARCH LETTERS, 2007, 35 (03) :336-344
[25]  
Hwang C.-L., 2012, Multiple Objective Decision Making-methods and Applications: A State-of-the-Art Survey, V164, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-45511-737
[26]   COMPUTATIONAL EXPERIENCE CONCERNING PAYOFF TABLES AND MINIMUM CRITERION VALUES OVER THE EFFICIENT SET [J].
ISERMANN, H ;
STEUER, RE .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1988, 33 (01) :91-97
[27]   A method for generating all efficient solutions of 0-1 multi-objective linear programming problem [J].
Jahanshahloo, GR ;
Hosseinzadeh, F ;
Shoja, N ;
Tohidi, G .
APPLIED MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTATION, 2005, 169 (02) :874-886
[30]   An algorithm for optimizing a linear function over an integer efficient set [J].
Jorge, Jesus M. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2009, 195 (01) :98-103